The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1943 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
[Inaudible.]—then, in evidence, suggested that more research needs to be done by the Scottish Government.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Yes, and that is relevant to the committee’s evidence gathering.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Do I have time to ask another quick question, convener?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Convener, I do not know whether anybody is planning to ask about the issue of age. It came up in the previous evidence session, with regard to evolving capacity.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Can you explain that, because I am finding it difficult to understand?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I will leave it there but, unfortunately, there are people who are self-excluding because they do not want to come out and say what they are experiencing. As a result, they do not access services because of their fears or concerns. That is just one side of the argument.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I want to ask about your experience of different international models. Obviously, jurisdictions across the world are very different.
Can you talk us through how you see the differences between Scotland and other jurisdictions? For example, you said that in some of the countries that now have self-ID, medical documentation might have to be produced. There is not a standardised approach. How can we learn from the various examples? Do you have a favoured country that has taken an approach that you agree with? On what principle has that been established?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I will say it again. What did you mean by “unintended consequences” of not specifically collecting data by gender and sex, under section 9, which you mentioned?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I will ask Robin White a similar question. You used the example of burglary to talk about the collection of sex data. On the basis of what Professor Sullivan just said regarding the unintended consequences, are there other areas in which you might differ in terms of the collection of data and the definition of sex and gender in that regard? Could you also comment on why it would not be right for Police Scotland to collect data on sex when it comes to more serious crimes such as domestic violence, murder, rape and abuse?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
It was about my take on the issue. Obviously, everyone has human rights and everyone has concerns about those, regardless of whether they are trying to better trans rights or to protect women’s rights. That is how it is, as the committee has heard. Should the exemptions that are set out in the Equality Act 2010 be looked at from the point of view of how we are evolving as a society? Given the different asks of people, the law needs to move on. Do you have an opinion on that?