The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1943 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I understand that—that is already covered in the protections.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Rachael Hamilton
That is with regards to gender representation on public boards, which is a devolved matter. What is the EHRC’s view on other aspects that are reserved?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Rachael Hamilton
The point is—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Thank you for letting me in, cabinet secretary. My question relates to Pam Duncan-Glancy’s amendment 146. The Scottish Conservatives are sympathetic to it, and I think that Pam Duncan-Glancy will have carefully considered its drafting. Therefore, I would like clarity about what data is not currently collected and what could potentially be collected very simply.
Subsection (2)(f) of the new section proposed by amendment 146 asks for information on legal challenges. That is important, because we know that there is confusion around the privacy provisions in section 22 of the 2004 act. It is important that the Government makes good legislation so that it understands the impact of legal challenges.
I am not sure whether Pam Duncan-Glancy will move her amendment, cabinet secretary, but is there any possibility of your having a wider conversation with us about what can and cannot be done under its terms?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Rachael Hamilton
What activities can you list that people use rough shooting as a cover for, as you have just suggested?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Rachael Hamilton
What are the similarities between trail hunting and rough shooting?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Rachael Hamilton
So, how could someone get away with pretending that they are rough shooting if they are trail hunting?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Your words were “as a cover for”, but that is what you are suggesting. Are you saying that people will pretend that they are rough shooting when they are trail hunting?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Will you confirm that it is not your intention to restrict rough shooting through the scope of the bill?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Can I have clarification? I think that you have contradicted what you said to Beatrice Wishart. My understanding of what was said before is that if two people had two dogs each and the four dogs were stalking and flushing, and person B shot something that the other person’s dogs had stalked and flushed, that would be an offence. Ms Fitzgerald said something opposite to that.