The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1943 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I know that we will disagree on this, because I still do not believe that rough shooting can be used as a cover for other activities.
I made two clear points: that the only activity that is done in rough shooting is flushing, and that in rough shooting, the bag is mixed quarry. On that basis, there is almost no event for which a proposed exception for rough shooting could be used as a cover, because it is so different.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rachael Hamilton
As you know, I have an interest in the hospitality business. The licences in that business are slightly different, as individuals take quite stringent exams to get to the point at which they are issued with a licence.
It is not necessarily fair to compare apples and pears in these circumstances. Although people have to have a gun licence and be competent to have a gun and so on, such comparisons slightly confuse the situation. In licensing, we need more clarity and succinctness, rather than trying to muddy the waters with comparisons with other industries that may be slightly different.
12:15Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Yes.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rachael Hamilton
With regard to those amendments, BASC, the Kennel Club and Scotland’s Regional Moorland Groups have all highlighted the bill’s unintended consequences for field trials. Gun dog trials test the working ability of such dogs in competitive conditions and follow strict regulations set out by the Kennel Club, a well-respected organisation that puts a large amount of resource into developing robust and rigorous guidance on the safe, lawful and humane operation of field trials. That is reflected in these amendments.
Similar to amendment 142, amendment 143, alongside its consequential amendments in my name, allows for field trials to continue unhindered and, for those who partake, confidence that they can carry out that activity unhindered. In response to a recent parliamentary question, the minister confirmed:
“Field trials which only involve the hunting of birds are not covered by the provisions of this Bill.
For field trials that involve the use of dogs to hunt wild mammals the participants will have to abide by the provisions of the Bill.”—[Written Answers, 10 November 2022; S6W-11800.]
However, we know that gun dogs are used to flush wild mammals during field trials, with the dogs not chasing or killing them. As with rough shooting, therefore, an exception would be required. Again, I would be grateful if the minister could put on record whether field trials fall under the bill’s scope and, if not, whether she and committee members would support my amendment for an exception to allow this legitimate activity to proceed lawfully and unhindered.
On amendment 227, the minister has stated that she is unwilling to pursue an exception for rough shooting, despite my clearly setting out the various parameters ensuring that an exception would not or could not be used as a loophole for other illegal activity. I therefore direct members’ attention to amendment 227, which recognises that, during a rough shoot,
“more than two dogs ... are not working simultaneously”
and
“more than two dogs ... do not work together in a pack or in formation.”
I reiterate that, as has been made clear by rural organisations and others, there is no intention during a rough shoot for dogs to form a pack, unlike with other activities. One person uses their own dog or two dogs to flush their own quarry, working in proximity to others, but they do not allow their dogs to form a pack. An exception specifically for rough shooting must be sought for that legitimate activity to continue. It should not be licensed, as that is neither a practical option nor the intention of this bill; as a result, an exception or other mechanism to allow rough shooting to continue unhindered must be considered. I welcome the thoughts of ˿ and the minister on that.
On amendment 228, the wording used in section 6(3) is highly emotive, and the amendment would replace it with neutral language that rural stakeholders feel to be more appropriate. I would add that the objective is to kill the wild mammal for purposes set out in the bill, not simply for it to be “attacked”. The term “kill” is used throughout the rest of section 6, and the amendment would ensure drafting consistency.
Thank you for your forbearance, convener.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rachael Hamilton
For the record, am I correct in thinking that field trials fall under the scope of the bill?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Will the minister take an intervention on that point?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Will the member take an intervention on that point?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I would like to come back to the minister to have a look at those amendments. I followed what she said on amendment 205, but I ask for clarification of the other amendment that she mentioned. Was it 222?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rachael Hamilton
The licensing scheme has not.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I ask Colin Smyth what he means by evidence of “state of mind”.