The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1535 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2022
Ross Greer
In the first instance, I would be interested in your thoughts on the level of pay in Scotland’s colleges, specifically at senior management and principal levels. Do you think that it is justifiable that there are multiple college principals in Scotland who earn more than the First Minister?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2022
Ross Greer
Will the Scottish Government issue a fuller response to the exercise? I accept that it is primarily for the unions and college management to respond to, but there is a role for Government here, and there are conclusions in relation to the Government. Will there be a fuller response from you on the contents of the report?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2022
Ross Greer
Thanks for that, minister. Can I clarify on what timescale the committee should expect to see the Government’s response?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2022
Ross Greer
Thank you. I certainly agree with that sentiment. If you look at pay growth in the sector over the past 30 years, you see that pay growth for senior management, and in particular principals, has completely outstripped, by a huge margin, that for lecturers or support staff.
10:15I appreciate that you shared with the committee the lessons learned report that Strathesk recently completed. However, I got a distinct sense of déjà vu when reading it. The report notes that the most consistent theme is the crushing lack of trust between the parties in the National Joint Negotiation Committee negotiations. In fact, it refers to it as a
“debilitatingly low level of trust”.
The report also observes the fact that that conclusion is not new—it was the key conclusion in the similar review that was conducted by John Sturrock five years ago. Why has no progress been made on resolving the core issue that is resulting in such regular industrial action?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Ross Greer
My instinctive position is that this is an appropriate point at which to close the petition. The arguments for and against an inquiry have already been heard, and Parliament previously considered that there was no need for an inquiry. The petition was held open for the purposes of the Children and Young People (Information Sharing) (Scotland) Bill, which the Government introduced to rectify the issues that came about as a result of the Supreme Court judgment on the named person policy. In the end, the Government withdrew that bill in the previous session of Parliament. I understand why the petitioners still feel the way that they do, but the arguments on an inquiry have already been heard, a position has been reached and nothing has changed since that point. The reason why Parliament kept the petition open is also no longer relevant.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2022
Ross Greer
I have a couple of questions around industrial relations, which are for Shona Struthers and Andrew Witty in the first instance.
I am sure that you will have seen that, as part of this inquiry, I have asked witnesses in previous sessions why they believe that we have had industrial disputes in the sector in seven of the past eight years when we have not had that in any other sector in Scotland. Would you like to have an opportunity to comment on that, in the first instance? What do you think has brought us to the point at which that has become, in essence, an annual occurrence?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2022
Ross Greer
On one level, I recognise that things have improved, because I have been involved to a varying extent over most of the years concerned. However, even with improvements, there has still been national industrial action in almost every one of those years—certainly, in every one of the past few years. If things are improving, why is there still national strike action every year?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2022
Ross Greer
It felt a bit like you sidestepped the issue of principals’ pay, there.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2022
Ross Greer
I have a final question on boards. Derek Smeall has been mentioned; you might be aware of the evidence that he gave on the Glasgow Colleges Regional Board. Does Colleges Scotland have a view on that? Do you align with the view that has been expressed to us that it is pretty hard to justify why that regional board exists at all?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2022
Ross Greer
You mentioned the latest lessons-learned report, publication of which is still to come. From that and internal reflections from within Colleges Scotland, are there further changes to the national joint negotiating committee framework that you would like? Is there anything structural about the process that could be improved? Some of the evidence that we have received and a lot of the wider public discussion on the matter comes back to challenging interpersonal relationships between people on the two sides who have been in the room for so long that issues have become entrenched. That is a cultural issue that can be resolved. Are there structural issues in the process that could result in improvement if they were changed?