The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1492 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2023
Ross Greer
Given that we have some communities in Scotland, particularly coastal and rural communities, in which between a third and a half鈥攁nd, in a few instances, more than half鈥攐f the properties are second or holiday homes, which are therefore unoccupied most of the time, would you acknowledge that, once that proportion of a local community is reached, the net impact on the community is negative? Any economic benefit during tourist season is more than outweighed by the fact that the community is in some cases largely vacant for most of the year.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2023
Ross Greer
Without wishing to pre-empt the report, given that there has been consistent, on-going dialogue with survivors, do you have any indication of what the impact has been so far? Has there been feedback that shows a particular trend?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2023
Ross Greer
I am sorry to cut across you, Deputy First Minister, but I am conscious of time. I am asking specifically about the organisations that made it clear that they would not contribute unless a waiver was in place. The organisations that were most vocal and were prepared to come to the committee and put their views on record were generally the organisations that were not intent on the waiver being necessary. In a way that was significantly problematic for parliamentary scrutiny, the organisations that did not appear in front of the committee and did not put their views on the record were quite clear, off the record, that they would not contribute without the waiver being in place. Have those organisations contributed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2023
Ross Greer
My last point on that is to ask you, as part of that review process, to ensure that the views of survivors who have chosen not even to begin the application process are taken into account. We can assume, based on the evidence that we took in the first place, that a number of those who decide not even to embark on the process may well do so because the waiver is in place.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2023
Ross Greer
Yes, that is a very welcome invitation. Thank you.
You will remember that by far the most controversial element of the proposals in the bill and what is operating in the scheme was the waiver. We all struggled with that, and a number of us came to very different positions on it, despite complete consensus about the broad principles of the bill. Could you talk a bit about the specific arrangements that are in place to ensure that the review will be able to report on the impact the waiver has had? The primary purpose of my amendment was to ensure that we could assess the impact of the waiver.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2023
Ross Greer
The core purpose of the waiver, and the argument that was put to us about why the waiver was necessary in the first place, was that it would ensure that certain organisations made a contribution to the scheme and were willing to participate. Have those organisations done so to a satisfactory extent?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2023
Ross Greer
Deputy First Minister, you will remember that, during the stage 3 proceedings on the bill, Parliament agreed to my amendment asking for an 18-month review during the scheme鈥檚 initial period of operation. Please talk us through the processes that are in place to gather the evidence that that review will require.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Ross Greer
I appreciate that answer, but if I was working in local government or the university sector, which, like local government, will be somewhat better off than it would have been under the plans in the RSR鈥攁lthough I acknowledge that those sectors will continue to feel that they need to ask for more money鈥攐n what basis should I use the RSR for forward planning, given that the specific numbers in it are no longer valid? Should I presume that the broad trajectory will continue鈥攆or example, the flat-cash trajectory for sectors such as the university sector? Should I assume that there will be flat cash in 2024-25 and 2025-26, based on what is in the 2023-24 budget?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Ross Greer
Yes. It is usually at the end of January or the start of February, but I presume that it might be somewhat later than that this year.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Ross Greer
Thanks. I acknowledge that it will be hard to disaggregate behaviour changes that are specifically the result of a change in tax policy as opposed to wider factors in the economy. However, such disaggregation would be valuable, if it is at all possible, as we scrutinise the future direction of tax policy.