The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1570 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Jamie Greene
You keep saying that, but how are we going to fix it?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Jamie Greene
Thank you very much for that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Jamie Greene
Why is the service not able to respond more quickly? Does it not have enough ambulances or staff, or has demand increased exponentially? Is it all of the above?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Jamie Greene
Good morning. Ms Lamb, on Monday, the First Minister made a speech about the state of the NHS in Scotland. He described the NHS as being “fundamentally resilient, fundamentally robust.” No sooner had he stood down from his place at the lectern than the director of the Royal College of Nursing in Scotland responded, saying:
“Many nursing staff will not recognise the first minister’s description of a resilient and robust NHS in Scotland. Their current experience is of a service struggling to meet the needs of patients and leaving them to carry the burden of not being able to deliver the care and treatment required.”
Who is correct—the First Minister or the director of the Royal College of Nursing in Scotland?
11:15Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Jamie Greene
My final question is slightly off-centre. What has been done to improve whistleblowing in the NHS? Many łÉČËżěĘÖ will have been contacted by constituents, particularly those who work, or who have worked, in the NHS, with complaints or anecdotal evidence of malpractice that has led to patient safety being put at risk. What has been done to improve the process? I have dealt with a number of cases in which NHS practitioners feel that the current process is simply not working, and I know the levels of frustration that they feel as they go through us, then to ministers. They feel that the responses that they get when it comes to dealing with complaints or allegations are extremely poor. Do you think that the situation is better than it was?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Jamie Greene
I am all for people working together and agencies working collaboratively. We hear a lot about that—it is civil service lingo—but the reality is that the numbers speak for themselves. Something is not working, and it is clear that the Government is failing to meet its objective in delayed discharge, which is causing a huge number of issues. Have you had any feedback at all?
Let me ask a more fundamental question. Do you think that the IJB model is broken? I ask because it does not seem to be delivering for folk.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Jamie Greene
I am not talking down nurses.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Jamie Greene
Let us do a reality check. You agree with the First Minister that the NHS is “resilient” and “robust”, but not a single NHS board in Scotland is meeting its 12-week out-patient target or their in-patient target—not a single NHS board in Scotland is meeting its 18-week planned care target. One in six Scots is sitting on an NHS waiting list—that is nearly 900,000 people, of whom nearly 10,000 have been on a waiting list for over two years. To top it all off, Scotland has one of the lowest life expectancies in western Europe. Does that sound like a “resilient” and “robust” health service that is fit for purpose and that is delivering for the public?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Jamie Greene
The target for A and E treatment is that 95 per cent of people are dealt with within four hours. That can mean that someone is admitted to hospital, if that is considered necessary, then discharged, or treated then discharged. The current average performance is 69 per cent, which exactly marries up with what you have just said—far too many people in A and E are not being treated, moved on or moved out of that environment, which has a knock-on effect on ambulances.
What is the issue in A and E specifically? Are people turning up when they should not? Is it understaffed? What is the problem? What is causing the delay?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Jamie Greene
The figures are atrocious. I point you to page 48 of the Audit Scotland report, which I flagged at a previous meeting of the Public Audit Committee. What you would normally expect to see on that page—as I am pleased to see in other tables—are little green ticks where targets have been met. However, there is not a single green tick anywhere on that page.
The numbers speak for themselves. The targets are 95 per cent, 100 per cent and 90 per cent for beginning treatment within given timescales. They are ambitious. I get that. I know that the health service is very challenging across the UK, but look at the performance measures on that page. Look at in-patient treatment within 12 weeks of a decision to treat. The poor people in Grampian are sitting at 46 per cent of the 100 per cent target. Fife and Forth Valley are at 47 per cent. For the three targets, Lanarkshire is at 61 per cent, 46 per cent and 60 per cent—nowhere near the targets. There are huge numbers of people waiting for far longer than they should, and £100 million is not going to scratch the surface, is it?