The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1570 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Let us get this right. The budget, if it is agreed to, will allocate around ÂŁ47 million to the yard, of which ÂŁ37 million will be used to complete the Glen Rosa, and there is ÂŁ14 million of capital money. Also, ÂŁ9 million of the capital money will be allocated to the Glen Rosa. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Perhaps you can write to us and outline that. We asked Audit Scotland about that previously, and there was a lot of confusion over the numbers.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Let us segue nicely to the Scottish Government. Would that request be granted?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
I am sure that Mr McMillan is more than capable of agreeing with many of those points, and I am sure that we will hear some of them from him. As someone who lives in Greenock, I agree with many of the points that I am sure that he is about to make, but that is not the point of this committee, and it is not the point of the Auditor General’s work. That specific work, rightly, involves holding to account senior civil servants, ministers and people who run enterprises that are owned by the public, funded by the public and paid for with taxpayers’ money. We are entirely doing our duty in that respect.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
There is a track record of your having said to ministers that something is not value for money for public investment.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
In your opening statement, you said that the three pillars of being a good sponsor of a public asset such as Ferguson’s are good governance, transparency and value for money. Which of those is demonstrated in the conversation that we have had today? We have heard numerous examples of poor governance and there has been a lack of transparency, with basic questions that cannot be answered. Certainly, value for money is out the window. The ferries were supposed to cost £97 million for the two, but we are now nudging towards £400 million of public money. Is that a complete failure on your part?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Thank you for putting your faith in their importance, convener.
Gentlemen, I appreciate that the clock is ticking. I recently jumped on the bandwagon of looking into my ancestry, and, when I got the certificates through, I discovered who my grandfather was. It said on the certificate that he was a welder in a Greenock shipyard, which was a surprise to me, because my granny never told me that. It then transpired that his father was a welder in a Greenock shipyard as well, so you could say that it runs in my blood. How on earth I am sitting here in a suit, talking about their finances, is another matter.
You are right, Mr Petticrew, that everyone wants to see the yard succeed. The question that we face—this goes back to the Auditor General’s report—is about the fact that Audit Scotland has analysed the numbers and the current situation and has flagged some very serious risks around the business as a going concern. None of us wants to talk in those terms or in that language, but we have to reflect on what the Auditor General said. Therefore, I am looking for some comfort that, on the basis of the strategy and throughout the business, including at board level—as you say, it goes from the bottom up, from the apprentices in the yard right through to those in the Scottish Government who are in charge of the strategic vision for the business as a publicly owned asset—there is a real joined-up approach to creating a sensible and realistic plan for a future for the yard. Otherwise, all the warnings in the Auditor General’s report would sadly come to pass. Fill me with some confidence that that is not the case.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
That is a nice segue into colleagues’ questions about the future of the yard.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Let us talk about that. One of the major flags raised in the previous evidence session and in the report was the idea that all the eggs have been put in one basket, that being the small vessel replacement programme. The Auditor General said:
“if the yard was unsuccessful in securing work through the ... programme or if ... the shortfall was not backfilled by other ... avenues,”
there is doubt
“about the yard’s viability.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 16 January 2025; c 11.]
Other comments were made around that in writing and in the evidence from witnesses sitting where you are sitting. Do you accept that, in the creation of the business plan for the yard, too much emphasis or reliance was placed on winning that business? If that work does not follow through, does it leave a huge, gaping hole in your business plan?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Will that money be ring fenced? That is the question. Will capex investment in the yard be ring fenced?