The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1619 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Jamie Greene
Oh, right鈥攖hat is the next group of amendments.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Jamie Greene
Thank you, cabinet secretary鈥攖hat is probably the best birthday present that I have ever had. You have just provided an acknowledgement of a process and a practice that is not delivering for everyone in the justice system, an understanding of the issues and the implications of the changes and a promise to seek to do something about that. I could not have asked for more.
On that note, I am happy to work with the Government ahead of stage 3 on a suitable amendment that expands the franchise for solemn cases, perhaps with a view at some point to looking at the knock-on effects of expanding that to summary cases. I understand the implications for resources and the volume of cases. Nobody wants trials to be delayed and no one wants to unnecessarily re-traumatise victims, but that step change is the right direction of travel.
I believe that there is a constructive consensus around the table and among political parties in the Parliament to make that work. I look forward to working with the cabinet secretary and her officials to lodge such an amendment at stage 3. For that reason, I seek to withdraw amendment 240.
Amendment 240, by agreement, withdrawn.
Amendments 241 to 245 not moved.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Jamie Greene
Bear with me; it has been a long week. I will not move it.
Amendments 237 and 238 not moved.
Amendment 239 moved鈥擺Jamie Greene].
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Jamie Greene
Yes.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Jamie Greene
Thank you very much. That was exactly the summary that I was hoping for, and it all makes complete sense. I am very grateful for the opportunity to revisit some of those amendments ahead of stage 3鈥擨 will, of course, do so鈥攁nd I hope that we can make some of those changes to the bill.
On the point that the Labour members have made, there should be an opportunity to scrutinise any amendments that are lodged either by me or by the Government ahead of stage 3, so that everyone has a chance to feed in to them and consider the effect that they might have. When they come back to the Parliament as a whole, that information will be available to all 成人快手.
I am sure that the Government and I can work on those amendments together, to ensure that members are informed and that due consultation, if needed, takes place ahead of stage 3. I appreciate that it is a tight window of opportunity, but we need to know what effect those changes would have on justice partners. That willingness to work with me will be warmly received by many of the people who, I know, are watching the session this morning, and I am very grateful for it.
Amendment 246, by agreement, withdrawn.
Amendments 247 and 248 not moved.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Jamie Greene
I have not.
That is all the amendments that I have in this group. I move amendment 249.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Jamie Greene
Will the member take an intervention?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Jamie Greene
On the latter point, the victims commissioner seems like a good place for the charter to live, because, if we are to create a commissioner鈥檚 office, it is important that it is more than just an expensive quango鈥攊t needs to have teeth. If the commissioner鈥檚 remit is very much to have a social contract with the public, in that they know that there is an advocate out there who is looking after their rights and whose sole focus and raison d鈥櫭猼re is to improve outcomes for victims, the relationship should be between the commissioner and the public鈥攊n this scenario, victims.
I have drafted another version of the amendment鈥攁mendment 236鈥攚hich would place the onus on ministers instead of the victims commissioner. It could be argued that the charter should be the responsibility of ministers. However, when I have lodged such amendments in the past, there has been quite a lot of pushback from ministers. Both options are available for the committee and, ultimately, it can vote on either option. I am interested in hearing what the cabinet secretary has to say.
Amendment 236 is a back-up, if amendments are agreed to that would remove the commissioner from the bill. I would still like to see the charter in place, so placing the duty on ministers is a fallback position. Personally, I am not that fussed. Victims want improved outcomes and all justice agencies to work together with a shared common goal. The charter is one method of achieving that. I will stop there and listen to what other members have to say.
I move amendment 234.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Jamie Greene
Happily so.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Jamie Greene
Thank you.