成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 19 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1570 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Jamie Greene

We understand the concept of increasing time limits so that cases do not time out. That is entirely appropriate and it would be difficult to argue against it. However, increasing time limits has a substantial impact on both parties鈥攙ictims and accused, and, in particular, accused who are held on remand.

Other than not allowing cases to time out, what possible justification is there for extending case time limits? Is that the only suitable reason?

Criminal Justice Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Jamie Greene

On a technical level, therefore, the provisions are an extension of temporary powers. Is that extension time limited or permanent?

Criminal Justice Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Jamie Greene

Why do you need to have the power in future?

Criminal Justice Committee

Risk Assessment in the Justice System

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Jamie Greene

I thank the Government for its briefing, albeit it was not easy trying to digest 18 pages overnight, given the technicalities of the problem.

I want to get my head around the bigger picture. During last week鈥檚 statement, we did not have a lot of time to go into detail, due to pressures on chamber time. This is a great setting in which to do that. Is 1,317 the maximum number of cases that have had a wrong risk assessment as a result of information technology glitches, or could there be more cases and you need to do further work to find that out and how far back the problem goes?

Criminal Justice Committee

Risk Assessment in the Justice System

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Jamie Greene

The language that is being used is around live or known public protection issues, but is the cabinet secretary confident that no one has been released earlier than they should have been? If anyone has been released earlier than they would have been under normal circumstances鈥攚ere it not for the IT glitch鈥攄id any of those people, at any point in the past, pose a public protection issue? Outwith normal reoffending rates, which we talked about earlier, did any of those people go on to reoffend or end up back in the system? I guess that we are looking for a little bit more comfort that those who were released inadvertently did not go on to reoffend.

Criminal Justice Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Jamie Greene

If we work on the assumption that people are innocent until proven guilty, which is a cornerstone of the Scottish legal system, do they not deserve the right to a physical trial if they want one?

Criminal Justice Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Jamie Greene

That implies that clearing the backlog is more important than the rights of an individual in Scottish law, and I would dispute that.

Criminal Justice Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 March 2022

Jamie Greene

Thank you for outlining why you disagree with those elements of the bill.

Stuart Murray, we have heard that the backdrop or context for this is the backlog of cases. I hope that I am incorrect in assuming that, because of the backlog, there is an inevitability about extending the time limits, because so many cases will simply not reach the first, second or third stages of proceedings without some form of extension. No one wants cases to fall off the edge of a cliff because they have reached technical time limits鈥攖hat is not good for the accused or the complainer. What is the bar association鈥檚 view?

Criminal Justice Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 March 2022

Jamie Greene

Thank you for that helpful suggestion. If ministers need the power, they can come back to Parliament and ask for it. As I recall, we passed that particular legislation in a matter of days.

Do you have a view on that, Vicki?

Criminal Justice Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 March 2022

Jamie Greene

I will keep this question brief, and I would request brief answers.

I guess my fundamental question is about the power to release being granted to ministers by Parliament on the grounds of the public health emergency鈥攊n other words, for the safety and security of those within the prison environment. Is that a power that ministers should have鈥擨 am not talking about governors of individual institutions鈥攁gainst the backdrop of what is already a debatable presumption of automatic early release of short-term prisoners?

Secondly, even if you agree that ministers should hold this power within the confines of a health emergency, do you think that they should keep it after such an emergency only to deal with any other pandemics that might arise and for that reason alone?

I will start with Stuart Murray. Could you be brief, Stuart?