The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Liam Kerr
No, but it is in the Parliament’s gift.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Liam Kerr
Just to be clear, the amendments that you are asking the committee to agree to today have not been discussed with the UK Government. You will discuss them with the minister tomorrow. We have just heard about the timescale and how tight it is, given that we are coming up to the recess. However, you have been discussing the amendments for months with industry. Is that correct, minister?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Liam Kerr
On a related point, how does Scottish Rail Holdings incentivise good performance by ScotRail, and equally, how does it penalise poor performance?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Liam Kerr
Thanks for that, but I am not sure that I heard an answer as to how you do or do not incentivise performance. When you say that you “encourage” better performance, does that mean that you sit in board meetings and say, “Come on, chaps—we must do better”?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Liam Kerr
I will stick with David Lowrie. Transport Scotland has expressed that Scotland’s railway should be decarbonised by 2035. Given the hopes and expectations that you have just outlined, how can you ensure that there will be effective decarbonisation by then?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Liam Kerr
I will stay with Mick Hogg and the tragedy at Carmont—that awful event in 2020 near Stonehaven. Just last week, it was revealed that only two of the 20 recommended actions have been taken following that tragedy. Now that the Scottish Government owns the railway, is it sufficiently taking into account the new risk from, for example, the climate emergency that concerns this committee? Are the Scottish Government’s budget decisions appropriate, given that 18 of the 20 actions remain untaken?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Liam Kerr
I just want to be absolutely clear. If that money was spent and the 20-minute saving was delivered, could there be a significant modal shift between Aberdeen and the central belt?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful for those answers.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Liam Kerr
Sure.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Liam Kerr
I have one more question, convener. I am very grateful for that answer, incidentally.
Robert Sansom, people in the north-east were promised ÂŁ200 million to invest in rail in 2016. The intention was to shave 20 minutes off journey times to the central belt, which would give better flexibility in the timetables, a better experience for the staff and a better experience for the passengers. I believe that just over 1 per cent of that has been spent and that, of course, the outcomes have not yet been delivered.
After one year of Scottish Government ownership, which does not appear to have had an impact on the spending of the ÂŁ200 million, how are passengers feeling about the 20-minute saving not being delivered? Is that having an impact on the recovery of our railway? Do you get a sense that the money will be delivered and that 20 minutes will be shaved off journey times?