łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1322 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]

Prevention of Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Liam Kerr

Dr Scott, I will stay with you for a follow-up question but I will pose the same question to Debbie Jupp straight afterwards. In your opening remarks, you talked about whether the measures that are set out in the bill will help to reduce domestic violence. In our papers, the argument is made that much of the point of having a register is deterrence, such that perpetrators might think twice because they might end up on a register. If someone is a perpetrator of domestic violence and know that they could face the full force of law and be convicted for it, and yet they still do it despite the risk of criminalisation, will a register really deter them?

Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]

Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (Service Delivery Review)

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Liam Kerr

I understand.

Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]

Prevention of Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Liam Kerr

I will turn to Tumay Forster first. It is proposed that the bill would apply to offenders who are convicted on indictment of an offence involving domestic abuse. My understanding is that the majority of cases go through the summary court system. If that is right, does such a distinction risk sending a message that there are two tiers of domestic abuse, rather than saying, “All domestic abuse is wrong”?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Liam Kerr

Good morning. According to the policy memorandum, the aim of the bill is to reduce the number of people in prostitution and reduce the impact on those who are, or have been, in prostitution. The committee has heard differing views and has been presented with differing evidence, as to whether the provisions in the bill as it is currently drafted will or will not achieve a reduction in prostitution. Do you maintain that the bill’s provisions will achieve the ends as set out in the policy memorandum? If so, can you help the committee understand why we should prefer that line of evidence, and reject the alternative?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Liam Kerr

I understand the point that the cabinet secretary is making, but the process feels uncomfortable, particularly in the context of this week, when we are addressing legislation that was fundamentally flawed when it was passed by the Parliament, even after full scrutiny. That is something that concerns me more widely, so I make that point.

On the SSI that is before us, we have received submissions—from the likes of Victim Support Scotland—which, as ever, have been very helpful. Based on that, I will put a couple of questions to you. Will prisoners in the cases concerned be included in the victim notification scheme? If so, what information will be available to the eligible victims?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Liam Kerr

I understand. Thank you.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Liam Kerr

Good morning. The police told us that they need £33.7 million on top of the £104.9 million uplift. Part of the £33.7 million would go towards funding an additional 600 community officers. The committee heard about the role that those officers would play in prevention and proactive policing. There was also a suggestion that that would help to keep the prison population down. Given the need to reduce the prison population, which the cabinet secretary and I have discussed many times, as well as the significant challenges with things such as antisocial behaviour and retail crime, does the cabinet secretary acknowledge that, if the budget provides a lesser award than £33.7 million for community officers and others, the police’s ability to do community policing will be compromised and the outcomes will be worse?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Liam Kerr

I would like a brief clarification. Cabinet secretary, you talked about the fact that, under the notification requirements, a registered sex offender is already required to notify the police of a certain range of details—and you set out what they were. This SSI will add information on any application for a gender recognition certificate or on the issuing of a full GRC. This might be to do with the definition of the relevant start date—you talked about that being the date of conviction—but can you clarify: is the offender required to notify the police if they already have a GRC prior to the date of conviction?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Liam Kerr

Exactly.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Liam Kerr

I have a small follow-up question, because you brought in enforcement at the end. The convener asked an important question, and you brought up Northern Ireland and Ireland earlier. The committee heard in evidence from the Crown Office that it

“is mindful of the challenges experienced by police and prosecutors”

in those two jurisdictions. Do you accept that enforcement could be problematic? Earlier, in response to the convener, you said that this bill has been drafted differently. Can you help me understand precisely in what way it has been drafted differently if enforcement in Scotland is going to be different from enforcement in those jurisdictions?