The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1322 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Liam Kerr
Dr Scott, I will stay with you for a follow-up question but I will pose the same question to Debbie Jupp straight afterwards. In your opening remarks, you talked about whether the measures that are set out in the bill will help to reduce domestic violence. In our papers, the argument is made that much of the point of having a register is deterrence, such that perpetrators might think twice because they might end up on a register. If someone is a perpetrator of domestic violence and know that they could face the full force of law and be convicted for it, and yet they still do it despite the risk of criminalisation, will a register really deter them?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand.
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Liam Kerr
I will turn to Tumay Forster first. It is proposed that the bill would apply to offenders who are convicted on indictment of an offence involving domestic abuse. My understanding is that the majority of cases go through the summary court system. If that is right, does such a distinction risk sending a message that there are two tiers of domestic abuse, rather than saying, “All domestic abuse is wrong”?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. According to the policy memorandum, the aim of the bill is to reduce the number of people in prostitution and reduce the impact on those who are, or have been, in prostitution. The committee has heard differing views and has been presented with differing evidence, as to whether the provisions in the bill as it is currently drafted will or will not achieve a reduction in prostitution. Do you maintain that the bill’s provisions will achieve the ends as set out in the policy memorandum? If so, can you help the committee understand why we should prefer that line of evidence, and reject the alternative?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand the point that the cabinet secretary is making, but the process feels uncomfortable, particularly in the context of this week, when we are addressing legislation that was fundamentally flawed when it was passed by the Parliament, even after full scrutiny. That is something that concerns me more widely, so I make that point.
On the SSI that is before us, we have received submissions—from the likes of Victim Support Scotland—which, as ever, have been very helpful. Based on that, I will put a couple of questions to you. Will prisoners in the cases concerned be included in the victim notification scheme? If so, what information will be available to the eligible victims?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. The police told us that they need £33.7 million on top of the £104.9 million uplift. Part of the £33.7 million would go towards funding an additional 600 community officers. The committee heard about the role that those officers would play in prevention and proactive policing. There was also a suggestion that that would help to keep the prison population down. Given the need to reduce the prison population, which the cabinet secretary and I have discussed many times, as well as the significant challenges with things such as antisocial behaviour and retail crime, does the cabinet secretary acknowledge that, if the budget provides a lesser award than £33.7 million for community officers and others, the police’s ability to do community policing will be compromised and the outcomes will be worse?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I would like a brief clarification. Cabinet secretary, you talked about the fact that, under the notification requirements, a registered sex offender is already required to notify the police of a certain range of details—and you set out what they were. This SSI will add information on any application for a gender recognition certificate or on the issuing of a full GRC. This might be to do with the definition of the relevant start date—you talked about that being the date of conviction—but can you clarify: is the offender required to notify the police if they already have a GRC prior to the date of conviction?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Liam Kerr
Exactly.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Liam Kerr
I have a small follow-up question, because you brought in enforcement at the end. The convener asked an important question, and you brought up Northern Ireland and Ireland earlier. The committee heard in evidence from the Crown Office that it
“is mindful of the challenges experienced by police and prosecutors”
in those two jurisdictions. Do you accept that enforcement could be problematic? Earlier, in response to the convener, you said that this bill has been drafted differently. Can you help me understand precisely in what way it has been drafted differently if enforcement in Scotland is going to be different from enforcement in those jurisdictions?