The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I will ask one question because of time. I will direct it to you, Tim Lord, and then, if Jeremy Lawson and Sandy Begbie want to add to your answer, they can indicate that in the chat box.
The deputy convener’s question about investing was a good one, and the answer that you gave about pensions and public influence is important. You said that one of the roles of pension funds is genuine emissions reduction, and, in your answer to Mark Ruskell’s question, you talked about the energy market.
One of the ways to achieve emissions reduction is to increase our sourcing of local rather than imported oil and gas, which will also help to reduce energy costs to the consumer and increase our energy security. Companies such as BP and Shell are investing a great deal in EV charging while other oil and gas companies are investing in wind power. How do you decide what investment decisions are green and, thus, which companies or projects it is appropriate to invest in or divest from? How much are those decisions influenced by the attitude of Governments and the public towards, and their understanding of, the domestic oil and gas industry, for example?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Liam Kerr
The ambition is not being delivered, and the minister has not answered the questions that were posed by Maurice Golden in particular. I abstain.
For
Natalie Don (Renfrewshire North and West) (SNP)
Jackie Dunbar (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
Fiona Hyslop (Linlithgow) (SNP)
Mark Ruskell (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Against
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Abstentions
Liam Kerr (North East Scotland) (Con)
Dean Lockhart (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I am not sure that that answers my question, minister, because there will obviously be a scheme cost to the public purse to set it up. Perhaps you can come back on that if you are aware of such costs and they have been sorted out.
Secondly, has the Government strategised any scheme to allow smaller businesses to attract and retain customers in a similar manner to the big supermarkets, which presumably can incentivise customers through their loyalty schemes?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I hand back to you, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for those answers. I think that what I am hearing, particularly in George Tarvit’s answer to the second part of my question, is that there is not yet a sufficient plan to leverage the £33 billion. On that note, in an earlier answer to the convener, John Wincott mentioned the Scottish green public sector estate decarbonisation scheme. Is that scheme sufficiently funded to decarbonise the public sector estate?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for that summary.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Liam Kerr
Earlier, the convener talked about funding and the need to leverage private finance. The Scottish Government proposes to deliver its heat in buildings strategy using £336 million this year and £1.8 billion by 2026. Will that be enough? As far as the witnesses are aware, is there a sufficient plan to leverage the £33 billion that will apparently be required?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I put the same questions to Philip Revell.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Liam Kerr
Good morning, minister. The regulations strike me as welcome but extraordinarily complex, so I want to ask a couple of things to clear them up in my mind. Section 8A(5) of the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 defines “nitrogen use efficiency” and you said that that means comparing what goes in with what comes out. Regulation 4 sets the baseline for that at 25 per cent. Will you explain what that means? What is that 25 per cent? What is going in precisely where and coming out precisely where, and why was 25 per cent felt to be the appropriate figure for the efficient use of nitrogen?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2022
Liam Kerr
I will be brief. I direct my question to Mark McRitchie, who I ask to give a brief answer if possible; the other witnesses can come in if they have something to add.
The heat in buildings strategy requires homes to have an energy performance certificate rating of C by 2033. The installation of new or replacement fossil fuel boilers will be phased out after 2025 for off-gas houses and from 2030 for on-gas houses. Are communities aware of those impending deadlines? Is sufficient support available to them to meet the deadlines? In any event, are communities aware of that support?