The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful for that answer. Your last point might be the key one. I have in mind the situation in Montrose in my region, which I have been very active—along with colleagues across the parties—in trying to address.
That leads on to a similar point. Several witnesses have talked about the current burdens on local authorities. As Bruce Wilson pointed out, that is in a context of major budget cuts and funding pressures. In your view, given what you have said about the need to proactively address the issue, is NPF4 sufficiently cognisant of the ability of local government, financially and resource-wise, to mitigate what is happening in Montrose and elsewhere? Does it need to be stronger in mandating central Government to provide the resources and the financing?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
I will direct a question to Paul White, based on the line of questioning that we have just heard from Monica Lennon. The CPT submission talks about the need for bus services to receive on-going funding, absent which operators will need to make some difficult decisions on, for example, fares, routes and frequency. The committee is carrying out an inquiry into local authorities’ ability to support the measures to achieve net zero, and we know that significant cuts to local authority budgets are coming. Noting that, is there sufficient recognition in NPF4 or more widely of what central Government needs to do to prevent the negative impacts that you mention in your submission?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Liam Kerr
I want to pick up on something that the cabinet secretary said earlier when he was asked about the heat in buildings strategy and the figure of £1.8 billion by 2026. The capital spending review states that the Government will invest £1.6 billion to decarbonise heat in buildings. Why is there that difference? In any event, which portfolios will get the money? Can the committee have a detailed breakdown of the proposed spending profile to 2026?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Liam Kerr
The committee would be grateful for that information.
Natalie Don asked good questions about the lack of progress on a circular economy. In your answers, you mentioned an intended circular economy bill. I think that that was first proposed in 2019 and was restated in the 2021 programme for government. Will you give the committee an update on when we can expect to see the circular economy bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Liam Kerr
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Liam Kerr
I will direct two questions to Dr Kerr but, if anyone else wants to come in after he has answered, they should just indicate that.
Dr Kerr talked about heat networks and policy 11. That policy appears to prioritise heat networks—or what people might know as domestic heating—over other technologies. There is a presumption against domestic biomass where heat networks are available. Does that strike the right balance between heating technologies and site-specific solutions? Does it sufficiently recognise other solutions for heating that might be more financially viable or, indeed, practical?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Liam Kerr
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I have several quick questions about data and measurement. How do you measure how far towards the 2030 climate goals the spending decisions in the 2022-23 budget will take Scotland?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Liam Kerr
To go back a stage, you talked about moving funds to support the green agenda. My question is related to the question that my friend Mark Ruskell asked earlier. More generally, how do you measure or project what the prospects of achievement for each project will be and whether the funding will be sufficient to deliver that? Similarly, how do you measure or project the opportunity cost of the reduction in investment elsewhere?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Liam Kerr
I cannot see whether anyone else wants to respond, so I will pose another question.
Dr Kerr referred earlier to the expectation that industrial developments with waste or surplus heat will be co-located with areas of demand. As we know, a significant proportion of demand will be for domestic heat. How do we strike a balance between using sources of low-carbon heat and building houses where people actually want to live?
Thinking about your last answer, I wonder whether that issue has been addressed anywhere else. What I am hearing from you—and, indeed, what we have seen in the submission from Scottish Renewables—is a feeling that this framework has been drafted somewhat in isolation. Is there anything else that we need to be aware of in this particular space?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Liam Kerr
In your opening remarks, you mentioned the allocation of £20 million to the just transition fund. What or who precisely is that paying for or going to? What are the measurable year 1 outcomes of that £20 million?