The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
That is very helpful. I am very grateful for that answer. I believe that other panel members might wish to come in, but I am not sure who.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
The instrument makes provision for schemes to be examined by a reporter, but only if the council chooses, and it will be for the council to choose the scope of that examination. The reporter goes on to decide on the process and a timetable for it. Some might feel that that amounts to the council marking its own homework. Under what circumstances would a council be expected to go through that process? Is it the default position that a reporter would be involved? What issues would the reporter consider when deciding on the procedure to be followed at a public examination?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
Thank you—that would be useful. You correctly anticipated my question about the timescale.
What consideration has the Scottish Government given to a situation in which a workplace is nowhere near public transport or in which, for example, shift workers cannot get home by public transport after a certain time? On a related note, what impact does the Scottish Government anticipate that such schemes would have on surrounding streets?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
I have a question about coastal protection and resilience, which I will direct to Anna Beswick, but if any other panel members wish to come in, they should just indicate.
Policy 35 says that
“Local development plan spatial strategies should consider how to adapt coastlines to the impacts of climate change”
and that there is a need for
“a proactive and innovative approach”.
In your view, how well does NPF4 support the need for climate adaptation and coastal resilience? How proactive does it require stakeholders to be?
11:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
I do, convener, but it is for Dr Brown, so perhaps you could bring me in at the end, if she reconnects.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
I want to pick up on the line of questioning that Mark Ruskell explored with Dr Brown. You talked about a lack of strategy in NPF4 and STPR2. We have heard quite a lot about the urban possibilities, but it is difficult to relate a lot of that to rural settings or areas where bus services perhaps cannot be run for financial reasons. That point is correctly set out in the CPT written submission.
The United Kingdom Committee on Climate Change says that we need 30,000 public electric vehicle chargers by 2030; we currently have about 2,500. To go back to your comments about the lack of strategy, does NPF4 sufficiently account for roll-out of EV chargers and can it facilitate the extent of roll-out that we need?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
Thank you. I have one final question, minister, on measurement. The stated aims of the policy, which you alluded to earlier, include reducing car use and increasing use of public transport. How does the Scottish Government intend to formally measure what is happening in order to establish whether the implementation of a workplace parking levy has caused the aims to be achieved—in other words, that there is causation rather than simply correlation? Also, to go back to the convener’s point, how does the Scottish Government intend to measure whether, if employers pass the cost on to employees, we are not simply forcing the lower-paid members of a company on to public transport while the higher-paid members avail themselves of the parking spaces?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
I have no further questions, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
No—that was an interesting answer. Local authorities face severe funding challenges, and you say that
“there must be an understanding that any bus route new or existing will receive on-going public sector funding”.
Has central Government sufficiently recognised that in NPF4 or more widely, in order to meet the aims that we all want to achieve, and which you pointed out?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Liam Kerr
In that case, I will hand back to the convener.