³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

That might not go down too well in Stranraer, convener, where people are trying not to travel to Edinburgh. They are trying to get the service a bit closer, in Glasgow.

A very powerful case has been made on the need for a further bit of work to look at how we advocate—to be frank, we do not advocate—for healthcare in rural areas. It is not about individual cases, although looking at the issues collectively will probably reveal policy failures; it is about trying to assist. The commissioner model in Australia, for example, is about providing policy advice to Government on how to tackle some of the big rural challenges. It is important that we look at that model and at whether we need an advocacy service to support rural healthcare in Scotland. I hope that the committee will support that—it is certainly something that I very much support.

My interest is primarily in the petition from Dr Baird, who is a constituent of mine. However, his proposal is pertinent to all the petitions that we are discussing—the common theme being inadequate healthcare provision in rural areas. The fact is that no one appears to be advocating on behalf of such communities and they are not being listened to.

Emma Harper highlighted the example of cancer care in Dumfries and Galloway, where our constituents in Stranraer have to travel to Edinburgh for treatment when there is a hospital in Glasgow that could provide it. Neither the health board nor the Scottish Government is tackling that problem.

In our discussions, a number of ideas have been suggested for how we could do so—in particular, by Mr Ewing, who said that we should have on health boards people with rural interests. I would hope that people who are appointed to a health board in an area such as Dumfries and Galloway would already have knowledge of rural healthcare. To reinforce that point would not do any harm.

However, we are failing to recognise that we have a Scotland-wide problem in rural healthcare. There will be commonality between the challenges in Caithness and those in Dumfries and Galloway, so there should be Scotland-wide solutions. When it comes to finding such solutions the problem is often—but not exclusively—the health board.

It was also suggested that the proposed national centre for remote and rural health and social care could have an advocacy role. I understand that it will be primarily a delivery mechanism, although crucially it will be part of the NHS, so it will not be independent. It is interesting that, yesterday, the Scottish Government announced that it now supports the proposal for an independent food commission and has rejected the idea that Food Standards Scotland could take on that role—I presume that is because it is independent of the Government.

It is key to our discussion that no independent national authority is advocating on healthcare on behalf of rural communities. There is a model for that in Australia, where there is the Office of the National Rural Health Commissioner. We should consider that model here in Scotland. I see no harm in carrying out a piece of work on how we could strengthen advocacy for rural healthcare in this country, whether it be through a commissioner or another model. It is absolutely clear that the current set-up is simply not working.

I thank the witnesses for sharing their views. I will go back to Derek Shaw on the point about Scottish Enterprise’s role being different from that of his colleagues in Highlands and Islands Enterprise and South of Scotland Enterprise. Douglas Cowan said that Highlands and Islands Enterprise has always had a community remit. Bryan McGrath will know that I spent many years calling for a similar arrangement in the south of Scotland, because I was struck by the fact that a business in Inverness town centre could receive support but a similar business in Dumfries could not receive such support. Now it can, because we have South of Scotland Enterprise.

The challenge now is that a business in Ayr cannot get the same support as a business in Dumfries because of Scottish Enterprise’s remit. Does that put Scottish Enterprise at a disadvantage when it comes to providing support for town centre businesses?

We have heard about the town centre living fund before. It is a good idea and is of huge benefit.

Mr Lindsay, do your powers go far enough? Mr Rogers said that you can take action when a building is dangerous, but is it fair to say that not a great deal can be done in other cases, even when there are trees growing through the windows or the windows are not even there, unless it is a listed building. Should the powers be strengthened?

Are councils sometimes reluctant to use the powers because, once they start, to be frank, it will draw on their resources?

It is just a general point. You do not support projects that have a more community-directed remit.

That is very helpful. On that point, Douglas Cowan, SOSE is very clear that the funding is linked to working with it so that it is financially viable. Does Highlands and Islands Enterprise take the view that even though those projects are obviously going to make lots of money, like SOSE, you link the funding to being able to make sure the project has a plan to deliver that financial viability?

An issue that has been raised extensively with the committee is the challenge of derelict buildings in our town centres. The committee visited Midsteeple Quarter in Dumfries recently, and our visit coincided with a certain street in the town being closed because a building on it had been deemed to be dangerous. It had been derelict for some years and it became so dangerous that the street had to be closed off. Craig Iles will not need me to tell him about a certain building in the centre of Ayr—the former Station hotel—that was closed because it was dangerous. That disrupted rail services in the town for months.

Something has clearly gone wrong when it comes to the action that we can take to prevent buildings in our town centres from falling into such a state of disrepair. Starting with Mr Rogers, will you tell us what you think has gone wrong? Do councils not have the powers or the funding that they need, or are they too slow to use their powers at an early stage to avoid town centre buildings getting to a point when they are closed because they are dangerous, with all the disruption that goes with that?

That support is available in every part of Scotland. We can think about projects that have been supported by Highlands and Islands Enterprise and South of Scotland Enterprise. For example, we recently visited Midsteeple Quarter in Dumfries, which is very much a community project. Would it be fair to say that a similar project in Ayr would not be able to get such support, because it would be up to Scottish Enterprise to provide it, rather than South of Scotland Enterprise, which has a community remit?

That would be helpful. Can I come to Douglas Cowan and Bryan McGrath? Because of that community remit, you are able to support projects that, it could be argued, will not make huge profits but are hugely important to the regeneration of our town centres in attracting people to support other businesses. I will ask Bryan McGrath about the Midsteeple Quarter example. How do you ensure that the support that you have provided ensures that the project becomes financially viable for years to come and will not keep coming back to look for funding?