The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1040 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Colin Smyth
It is important to recognise that the bill was passed by Parliament unanimously and that it stipulated that the regulations should come before us within two years. It is helpful that the minister has confirmed that the delay was entirely due to unsuccessful legal challenges by a number of big pub companies that sought to thwart the will of Parliament. It is also important to recognise that, as a result of those challenges, publicans are missing out on the rights that their counterparts in England and Wales have had since 2016.
I understand that, prior to the regulations coming before the committee, you received representations from the Scottish Licensed Trade Association, which highlighted that the code, as it is currently drafted, does not adequately protect tied pub tenants or reflect what was stated in the act. I appreciate that you have noted that larger changes may necessitate further consultation, but the SLTA outlined four areas, including market-rent-only leases, gaming machines and flow-monitoring devices, in which amendments could be made now, given that there was sufficient focus on those areas in the original consultation.
Have you given consideration to those proposed changes? Why have you opted not to make amendments to the regulations before us or, at least, to publish—before today—regulations that would have dealt with those particular concerns?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Colin Smyth
That is helpful.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Smyth
I have a final question on NSET. You say that it is clear, but one of Audit Scotland’s criticisms was that
“it is not clear how directorates are working together to agree funding priorities”
and that the level of investment needed to deliver NSET is unknown. It also said:
“There is a gap in collective political leadership”.
You were obviously the finance secretary at the time of its publication. How do you respond to the criticism that there is a lack of understanding about the level of investment that is needed to deliver NSET? What is the budget to deliver NSET?
09:30Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Smyth
What is the budget line across all departments?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Smyth
What is the level of investment that is needed to deliver NSET, though?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Smyth
It says:
“The Scottish Government has not determined how much investment is needed to deliver the NSET. This creates a risk to financial management and public accountability.”
Is Audit Scotland wrong when it says that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Smyth
I may have to wait until the beginning of July to get my answer to my question. In your opening comments, you reminded us that you were the finance secretary when NSET was launched with a key aim of addressing our weak productivity compared with that of international competitors. The Audit Scotland report of a couple of months ago said:
“Scotland’s productivity has remained ranked 16 out of 38 comparator economies over the last decade.”
Why has there been no progress on what was a key Scottish Government target to improve relative productivity?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Smyth
So there is not only a productivity gap but a delivery gap from the Government. We have not made a lot of progress.
Your comment earlier that we have too many strategies and plans was right. There are around 60 plans and strategies relating to the economy, and quite a few were published on your watch. We need fewer strategies and more action, which you just said, but that is what you said when you launched NSET in the first place. You said that there would be
“a ruthless focus on delivery”.
Why has there not been that ruthless focus on delivery? Why are you talking now about the fact that we need more action and a lot fewer strategies?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Smyth
What is the level of investment that is needed to achieve those aims across those many Government departments? What level of investment is needed to deliver them?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Smyth
It is doing the opposite. It is asking what the budget is across all Government departments. What do you say to Audit Scotland criticising the Government on the lack of clarity on what investment is needed across all departments? It makes the point that departments are working in silos—that is its criticism. When Audit Scotland says that there is a lack of clarity on the level of investment that is needed to deliver NSET, is it wrong?