The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1015 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Smyth
Our second item of business is consideration of a legislative consent memorandum on the Employment Rights Bill, which is United Kingdom Parliament legislation. I am pleased to welcome Ivan McKee, the Minister for Public Finance, who is joined, from the Scottish Government, by Stephen Garland, the unit head of the fair work division; Megan Lawson, a lawyer; and Jo Mitchell, a procurement policy manager.
I invite the minister to make a brief statement on the Scottish Government鈥檚 position.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Smyth
Our next item of business is our final evidence session on the Scottish Government鈥檚 new deal for business. I am pleased to welcome Kate Forbes, Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Gaelic; Judith Young, deputy director in the Scottish Government鈥檚 strategic economic and business engagement division; and Dr Poonam Malik. Dr Malik and the Deputy First Minister are co-chairs of the new deal for business group.
As always, I appeal to members and witnesses to keep questions and answers as concise as possible. I invite the Deputy First Minister to make a brief opening statement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Smyth
Thank you very much, Deputy First Minister. I will kick off with the first question. Why was the new deal for business needed? What failures in the relationship with business did you want to fix?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Smyth
I will ask the same question to Dr Malik. What is your view on the relationship before the new deal for business was established?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Smyth
Yes, it would be helpful to get that. Will that set out those measurable outcomes?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Smyth
Thank you鈥攖hat was helpful.
I will bring in Kevin Stewart and then the deputy convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Smyth
I have a couple of final quick-fire questions on the recommendations. The regulatory review sub-group recommended an overhaul of business regulatory impact assessments. Have BRIAs been revisited to assess the accuracy of the process and address any unintended consequences of it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Smyth
I bring in Daniel Johnson.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Colin Smyth
It is important to put the issue in context. At the moment, there are seven SPCB supported commissioners with a budget of around 拢15 million鈥攖he Scottish Public Services Ombudsman accounts for half of that鈥攕o I do not think that we are being flooded by commissioners. We have 191 so-called quangos with a budget of 拢6.6 billion, which is maybe more of an issue than commissioners.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Colin Smyth
That was an important consideration, so I went through those criteria. My starting point was that we needed somebody with an independent voice to stand up for older people, but I was conscious of the criteria. I went through each of the six principles in quite a lot of detail鈥攖hey are set out in the consultation document and, I think, in the public papers for this meeting. I needed to satisfy not only the Parliament but myself that my proposal met those principles. I believed that, if it did not, there was no point in taking the proposal forward, because the principles are sound.
I will not go through all six principles, but I will give you one example. On the clarity of the remit, my proposed commissioner would have a very clear remit, set out in the proposed bill, to promote and safeguard the rights and interests of older people. That purpose remains very distinct from that of any other office-holder鈥檚 post. I am very clear that there is a need for the role, and it very much meets the criteria, which were an important part of my consideration.
11:00