The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1292 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Rona Mackay
Does Detective Superintendent Brown want to comment?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Rona Mackay
That would be a loophole, albeit rare, with the register.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Rona Mackay
Last week, one of our witnesses said that the bill is an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy. Is that something that witnesses identify with when they think about the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Rona Mackay
I am talking about part 1.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Rona Mackay
I want to raise one other point. Last week, the witness from Shakti Women鈥檚 Aid raised the point about unintended consequences and the fact that any woman who was defending herself and had to fight back could end up on this register. Do you recognise that as a danger of having such a register?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Rona Mackay
Good morning. A lot has been covered so far, so my questions will be pretty broad brush, just to clarify some of the points that have already been raised. One of my questions would have been about whether the register would act as a deterrent. I am picking up that most of you do not think that it would be a deterrent to offenders. I just wanted to clarify that.
Professor Gilchrist, you said that you are not against the bill as such but that you are concerned about the practicalities involved. Do you think that the issues with regard to the practicalities of the bill could be resolved by amendment, should the bill get to stage 2? I know that it is a hard question to answer.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Rona Mackay
What about from the Crown鈥檚 point of view?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rona Mackay
Good morning. My question was kind of answered in Dr Scott鈥檚 introductory comments, so I will ask it in a much shorter form. I would like to go around everybody and clarify whether you think that the bill would add anything to the current multi-agency approach. I do not need a long answer because I have another question. Do you think that the bill is necessary and would it fit into the current structure?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rona Mackay
That is a very interesting point, thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Rona Mackay
We are trying to establish how effective the bill could be and what practical changes it could make, so all those comments are really helpful.