The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1295 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Rona Mackay
—would have an interpreter, yes.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Rona Mackay
It was lodged in 2020 and then it was referred to the Equalities and Human Rights Committee.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Rona Mackay
Good morning, Professor. I will ask you about chapter 5 of the report, which is on support in the criminal justice system, in relation to communication with people who have learning difficulties or additional support needs.
A constituent of mine has a petition going through Parliament; the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee talked about it yesterday—my colleague can confirm that. It relates to a member of their family who has experienced great distress trying to communicate with the police—and carers, actually—because she uses the Makaton signing system. My constituent is trying to promote that system and says that legal advocates and those who deal with people who have those needs should have that ability—or at least that some of them should. What is your view on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Rona Mackay
What I am trying to get at is whether the individual has the right to appeal against the decision on where to send them.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Rona Mackay
Would the person’s wishes be taken into account?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Rona Mackay
I agree with what you have said about data collection—that is crucial. I have no objection to our going back to Police Scotland; I simply the question the worth of that.
I definitely think that we should go back to the SPA to get an update on the review that it is doing. We should also ask about the point that is made in paragraph 16 of our paper, which is about why the SPF does not really have a voice at SPA meetings and why the SPA takes Police Scotland’s evidence as read. In other words, we should ask the SPA how robust it is being with its governance. I would like us to see whether we get anywhere with that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Rona Mackay
I am not disagreeing with what has been said, because we do need to ask questions, to see whether the Government can shine any light on the issue. The second last paragraph says that the SCTS will
“make information available on their webpages”,
which will include costs and information on how to get transcripts. Although I think that that is a move forward, questions still need to be asked.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Rona Mackay
Good morning. For clarity, Ms Medhurst, how long has the Prison Service been managing transgender prisoners in Scotland?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Rona Mackay
I am conscious of time. Would newly remanded prisoners who go to the establishment of their birth gender be segregated as a matter of course or could they be segregated if they requested it? I am thinking about their human rights in a situation where they have not been convicted of anything.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Rona Mackay
I agree with Jamie Greene, in particular regarding paragraph 16, which states that
“The SPF raises a concern that the SPA bases its oversight on evidence provided by Police Scotland”,
and that the SPF does not have much input. I agree that we should take up that point.
I do not agree so much with Jamie Greene’s first point about going back to Police Scotland. We have been there, and Police Scotland knows that we are not happy with the response, as does the SPA. The SPA governs Police Scotland, so the onus is on the SPA to get this right for the police and for us, and to give us the information.
Paragraph 11 states:
“In response to the Committee’s request, the SPA undertook an urgent review of the number of cases where officers and staff retired due to mental ill health ... The SPA confirms in their response that additional resources have been assigned and are having a positive impact on reducing the number of officers awaiting approval”.
We have had no update on that urgent review, so we do not know what the outcome was.
Paragraph 11 goes on to note that
“The SPA’s People Committee is to consider the outcomes of the review at its meeting of 28 February”.
It might be timely, therefore, for us to contact the SPA and ask what the outcome of the review was. I am not sure of the value of going back to Police Scotland, because I think that we will just get the same response.