³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content

Language: English /

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 30 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 959 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Rona Mackay

That is very reassuring.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Rona Mackay

It absolutely does. I want to ask you about when reviews are carried out in parallel with criminal proceedings and with regard to preventing prejudice. The Lord Advocate would have power to pause or end a review to prevent prejudice in those proceedings. How often and in what types of situations would that power be used?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Rona Mackay

Good morning. I will ask about the determination of when and whether to hold a review. Where there is a reviewable death, the oversight committee would still need to decide whether to hold the review. I guess that that would mean determining, for example, whether lessons could be learned from the situation.

Could you say a wee bit more about how that would work in practice? To get an idea of the context and scale of numbers, in what proportion of cases where there is a reviewable death do you anticipate a review being carried out?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Rona Mackay

I want to follow on from the convener’s question by asking about electronic signing of documents in criminal cases. That approach has been broadly supported and welcomed, but there has been a bit of discussion about the potential for digital exclusion in relation to some members of the public. Can you provide any reassurance in that respect to people who are not au fait with that technology?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Rona Mackay

That was helpful. Do you agree that victims should be informed when a case has been dealt with by way of a fiscal fine?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Rona Mackay

It is encouraging to know that the review would be speeded up for the families involved. That would definitely help to comfort them.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Rona Mackay

Moving on to the subject of fiscal fines, is the Government content that the powers of the prosecution to offer fiscal fines have been appropriately used and that the ability to impose higher fiscal fines has not given rise to problems in relation to people’s ability to pay and so on?

Criminal Justice Committee

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Rona Mackay

Good morning, Fiona, and thank you for your submission; I am pleased that you are very supportive of the bill. In your submission, you say that, in England,

“inquests provide a structured investigation into deaths.â€

How would you compare what we are proposing with what they have in England?

Criminal Justice Committee

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Rona Mackay

That is helpful—thank you. In your first answer to the convener, you mentioned anonymity. Will you expand on that a wee bit, including on the importance of anonymity and what you mean by it?

Criminal Justice Committee

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Rona Mackay

Good morning. So far, we have talked a lot about resources and finance, and I understand the importance of that. That said, I would like to take issue, Katie, with what you said at the start about the equally safe fund being depleted and not serving local needs. Frankly, I just do not believe that. Some £19 million has been given out to local authorities to work on such needs and on the preventative strategies that you said were not happening. I am just going to take issue with the premise of that. We might argue about the amount of it, but I would say that that fund fits perfectly into what we are trying to do here.

So far, all that I have heard about are barriers to the bill. If we could just go back to the bill that is in front of us, I am unsure whether any of you support its introduction. If we take finances out of the picture for a moment, do you support the previous witness’s view that there has been a long-standing gap in Scotland? England has a system in which families and victims are served better and that is what we are trying to do here. If you could clarify whether you support the bill, I would appreciate it.