The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 978 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Rona Mackay
Okay鈥攖hat is fine.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Rona Mackay
Sure.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Rona Mackay
Thank you. That is helpful, too. Dr Graham is indicating that she has nothing to add. It is good that you agree that perhaps more clarity is needed on that point.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Rona Mackay
You are saying that, to take it at a basic level, common sense should be used in domestic abuse cases. There has to be a pattern anyway before there would be a conviction, so surely that would come down to common sense without having to use specific parameters.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Rona Mackay
Thank you. That is really helpful. What is Professor McAra鈥檚 opinion on that point?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Rona Mackay
I am wondering about the chronological order for that. If we are going to ask the SCTS how many such trials have taken place, perhaps we should wait until we have that information before we contact the cabinet secretary.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Rona Mackay
I turn to Kate Wallace. From the point of view of victims, would it cause some alarm if section 23D was repealed and victims felt that they were being treated just the same as victims of every other offence, despite the almost unique nature of domestic abuse and sexual offences?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Rona Mackay
Do you want any changes to be made to the current exemptions? Should those exceptions be strengthened, or are you happy that they are in place?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Rona Mackay
I go back to a point that Professor McNeill made at the start of the session, about gravity of risk. If I understood him correctly, he said that he did not believe that the bill is for serious or solemn offences per se. If that is the case, does the fact that there is only one public safety test for all offences not send out the wrong message鈥攆or example, to victims? Should the current exceptions on domestic abuse and sexual offences not still stand? Could I have his opinion on the specific nature of individual risk and public safety in relation to the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Rona Mackay
Good morning, minister. This morning鈥檚 session has been very reassuring on a number of counts. We have heard from witnesses who do not want to think that the service is being rushed through without their having a chance to be listened to or to be part of the co-design. From what you have said to my colleague Russell Findlay about the timescale, you are giving that time.