łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content

Language: English /

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 2 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 959 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee

Policing Vulnerable People

Meeting date: 8 January 2025

Rona Mackay

Chief Superintendent Matt Paden, for context, how many safe spaces are operating throughout Scotland at the moment?

Criminal Justice Committee

Policing Vulnerable People

Meeting date: 8 January 2025

Rona Mackay

If staff require counselling after a specific incident, do they know that that is there for them?

Criminal Justice Committee

Policing Vulnerable People

Meeting date: 8 January 2025

Rona Mackay

Historically, Police Scotland—or the legacy forces—did not have a good track record in that area, but I am really encouraged to hear both what the previous panel of witnesses said was going on and what you have reaffirmed today.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Rona Mackay

That is quite encouraging, but I am sure that you understand the point that Sandy Brindley was making about agency being taken away from the victim if she is told, “Yes, you have to” or “No, you can’t”. That is traumatising in itself as, again, she is powerless.

It sounds like you understand that. An informed choice is exactly the point—it should be all about choice.

Does anybody else want to comment?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Rona Mackay

Right. I think that the problem that we have been struggling with is the lack of evidence. You probably heard that the previous witnesses have concerns about a two-thirds majority. They think that that raises the bar for convictions, particularly in sexual offence cases, for which, as you know, the rate is very low at the moment. Is there anything to say in favour of the provisions in the bill and the proposed amendments?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Rona Mackay

Thanks, convener. I will be brief, with a couple of wee follow-up questions.

Good morning. This is a really helpful session. I should say at the start that I am very much in favour of the sexual offences court. Have you had any sort of pushback from victims about the idea of such a court? Will they have the choice, unlikely as it might seem, to say that they do not want to be categorised in that way by using the court?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Rona Mackay

Is there a danger of you overthinking all this?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Rona Mackay

Again, with respect, we know that sexual offences are, by their nature, unique. Witnesses have told us of their terrible experiences because there is no uniformity in the way that they are treated. A sexual offences court would surely address that. Again, that is what they want.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Rona Mackay

Has that not got to do with corroboration, which still exists despite the—

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Rona Mackay

The Government has tried to balance the removal of the not proven verdict by moving to the two-thirds majority, as opposed to a simple majority, but in your opinion, that is not acceptable—is that correct?