The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1745 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
Could you hold that, Mr Gulhane? We have a few supplementary questions and you have already had a fair chunk of time.
I invite Brian Whittle in.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
You mentioned a particular legal case. I am trying to establish whether you see the provision in the bill on healthcare professionals having to discuss all available treatment options as running counter to that Supreme Court judgment and previous judgments on medical treatment options?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
Thank you for clarifying that.
I will just get you to clarify something else, although this might be an opinion rather than a total clarification. The bill as drafted talks about “dependency” as well as addiction. Could that potentially cover other drugs such as nicotine or caffeine?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
I call Gillian Mackay.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
I thank the witnesses for their attendance at the meeting this morning. The meeting will be suspended to change panels.
10:42 Meeting suspended.Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
Welcome back. We are continuing to take oral evidence as part of the committee’s stage 1 scrutiny of the Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill.
The committee will now hear from a second panel of witnesses, comprising representatives of professional organisations. I welcome Dr Peter Rice, who is a former chair of the Royal College of Psychiatrists in Scotland; Lyndsey Turfus, who is chair of the substance use sub-group at Social Work Scotland; and Dr Chris Williams, who is vice-chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners in Scotland. We will move straight to questions, and we will start with Sandesh Gulhane.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
I have a point of clarification for Hilary Steele on the McCulloch case, which she mentioned. I am also aware of the Montgomery case. Is there potential that the bill as drafted, if it became law, could run counter to those judgments, given that it specifies that certain treatment options must be offered?
10:15Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
Before we move on, I declare an interest: I hold a bank nurse contract with NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Clare Haughey
I have a short, sharp question about the clinicians who are involved in making those treatment determinations. My assumption, which is based on the bill and on listening to the previous witness panel, was that the clinicians would be NHS employees. However, if we look at who can actually make a determination, the list includes doctors, who may not be employed by the health service, and pharmacist prescribers, many of whom work in community pharmacies and are therefore contracted to the NHS for some, but not all, services. What is your opinion on that cohort of healthcare professionals, including advanced nurse prescribers, being determined in law as being able to make treatment determinations?