The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1229 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
That has been part of the challenge facing the Government for a number of years. Indeed, the point was pursued by one of the trade unions when it raised concerns about individual school-based data. I think that that sort of thing would need to be undertaken in a very sensitive way. I do not think that the issue is insurmountable, and of course it is part of the bill, which we are supportive of. We will continue to engage with Mr Johnson on this at stage 2, because we need to reassure local government that authorities are not going to be measured against one another and that national data will help inform better practice.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
I suspect that you are right.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
I have received quite a lot of correspondence about the school that the member mentions. In my original correspondence with members, I said that the legislative landscape means that responsibility for the school rests with Highland Council, not with the Government. However, given the quantity of correspondence, I am keen to meet parents and carers and to listen to them directly. I do not want to prejudge that meeting before it takes place and it is difficult for me to comment on individual circumstances, but, given the strength of feeling from parents and carers, my view as cabinet secretary is that I should meet and listen to them. I will allow that meeting to take place and, given his interest, I am more than happy to meet the member and other members.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
I do not want to prejudge the outcome of your engagement with the University of Dundee. I will say that the university is at a critical crossroads, and I know that the committee is mindful of that. We need to ensure the institution’s future, and that it is financially stable. The Government has been working on the issue for a number of months, and, as the committee also knows, the Scottish Funding Council is preparing conditions for funding that will support the institution to become financially stable.
I do not want to prejudge the evidence session. I await its outcome, and I am more than happy to continue engagement with the committee.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
I sincerely hope that the university is happy with the Scottish Government. We are providing a large amount of public money to help it, given the challenges that it has encountered as a result of the financial decisions that were taken by the previous management team.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
I am going to a meeting with the Scottish Funding Council after this evidence session, so I will interrogate the point that you have made. I am not necessarily sure that I agree with the point about impartiality, but I am more than happy to continue my engagement with the SFC in that regard.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
Which specific point are you alluding to with regard to impartiality?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
I think that the evidence base for that was background briefing in the press, with unattributed sources. Is that correct?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
The Government has said that we will support the bill at stage 1, but as the committee has heard about, the trade unions are concerned about some issues. We need to work with Mr Johnson to ameliorate some of the challenges. Definitions are part of the issue. We will continue to undertake that work, but there are diverging views on the issues, particularly from the teaching unions’ perspective, of which I am mindful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
I think that the committee has heard evidence on the role of the Care Inspectorate and, potentially, the role of His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Education regarding reporting in future. There are divergent views on that as well.
The committee heard from Pauline Stephen of the General Teaching Council for Scotland that, if we introduce the measures on a statutory footing, we need to be mindful that our approaches to child protection are not currently statutory. They are multi-agency measures, and the current landscape does not necessarily lend itself to a neat fix.
There is a big history behind the bill, with parents pushing for the proposed measures to happen, but it is fair to say that it has been challenging for the Government, over a number of years, to resolve the issues.
As for reducing the number of incidents, my understanding is that the Care Inspectorate has moved away from some practices over a number of years. That has partly been informed by the Promise—from which, I put on the record, I am recused. The committee has heard about the movement and change in behaviour, approaches and practices that has been happening organically over time. There has been a focus on moving away from such types of practices, and the committee has taken evidence on that from witnesses who have concurred with the opinion that has been expressed.
Remember, however, that the Care Inspectorate evidence is only one side of the coin. We do not have the granular detail from education services, and I think that we need it to inform the review.