The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1229 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
There are.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
It is fair to say that there continue to be issues in relation to the court, but that is a matter for the management team, and the university itself, to engage with.
The issues in relation to the court speak to the governance issues to which Pamela Gillies referred. That is for the committee to consider; it needs to be mindful of those aspects. Part of the challenge that Pamela Gillies spoke about was that the court was not working in the way that it should have done in order to provide challenge to decisions that were made previously. I am sure that the committee will want to explore those things, but I will, of course, explore them further with the SFC later to give me reassurance in that regard.
Richard Maconachie has been attending a number of court meetings with observer status for the SFC, so I am sure that I will engage with the SFC further on that this week.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
I think that there were issues with membership. There were issues with trade union engagement as well, and issues with papers being shared late. That is off the top of my head, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
Yes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
Of course we can—and we may yet do so.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
Ms Don-Innes leads on the children’s rights scheme. I think that it is part of the Promise—is that right? [Interruption.] I am being told that it relates just to children’s rights. However, I think that the timing of the guidance being published in November is quite complementary to the passage of the bill. We are nearly in November, and we are only at stage 1 of the bill. The committee might or might not be content with that update when it is published, so feel free to come back to the Government to probe us on the issues. However, we are strengthening children’s rights through our approach.
I will come back to the point that the member raised with Denise McKay about the 1980 act, because it goes back to the points that Pam Gosal made about mandating certain aspects of the curriculum. If you were to open up the 1980 act, you would see that there are lots of things that we could do. We would not have a five-page bill in that case, and some big, serious questions would potentially have to be asked about the delivery of education.
If the committee is interested to know—probably not for the purposes of the bill before us, but in the education space generally—I have commissioned John Wilson, a former headteacher in Edinburgh, to lead a piece of work for us on school governance and what comes next in how we fund our schools after the Scottish attainment challenge, which is meant to come to an end. We have extended it for a year, but such things need to be considered in the round. Indeed, Pam Gosal’s parliamentary colleague Oliver Mundell is very interested in how we provide support to our schools and local authorities. We have 32 councils, and we have heard today about some of the challenges that that can create. We should not separate those issues from wider considerations on public policy.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
I am sorry, but I thought that the question was about compatibility.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
It has not, at the current time, but that is not to say that it might not be used in the future.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
I will come to your second question first. I was struck by some of the evidence that the committee heard on that point, because a number of stakeholders said that parents are perhaps not aware of that legal right, which has existed for many years. In the guidance that will sit alongside the bill, if it is passed, we will provide further clarity on that.
One of the parental organisations that the committee took evidence from—it might have been Connect—talked about disparate approaches to school handbooks and the situation not being communicated in the way in which it would have expected. I am happy to reflect on that. The passage of the bill will, in itself, draw parents’ attention to the fact that they have that right, and that will foster better understanding. The guidance, which has also been raised by stakeholders in evidence given to the committee, will provide further clarity on parental rights.
On how the guidance works at the current time, we have very low rates of withdrawal. The committee took evidence on that from Barbara Coupar from the Scottish Catholic Education Service, and I spoke to her yesterday. We are looking at very low percentages for withdrawal rates. Lewis Hedge might want to give the committee the specific numbers. I think that there is a 0.59 per cent withdrawal rate overall—that is 0.56 per cent from religious observance and 0.19 per cent from RE. Is that correct, Lewis?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Jenny Gilruth
Forgive me, Ms Chapman, but are you talking about the independent right to withdraw?