The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1067 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Ivan McKee
Just to be clear, my understanding of what you are saying is that you have not done any number crunching, so we could go through the process of getting the accord signed and putting out the procurement for the assessments but then find that everything slows right down, because there is not the capacity to deal with what is required. Have you actually crunched the numbers to figure out what they look like and how long the process will take as a consequence?
10:45Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Ivan McKee
My other question is about costs. We have talked about orphan buildings and the cost for those coming back to the public purse at some point. Has there been any estimation or assessment of that? Is there a process to work out what that cost might be?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2023
Ivan McKee
That was very helpful. On the surface of it—and obviously without understanding the detail of what is or is not included—I think that it looks, pro rata, to be a much more significant investment than the UK Government has put into Turing. Indeed, it seems to be three or four times as large. It would be helpful to understand how that would play into the Scottish context with regard to the costs of a scheme here.
My next question is a more open one. What will be the next steps for Taith? Where do you see the programme going, based on what you have learned over the past year or so? Is there scope to develop or change the programme in any way? [Interruption.] I think that you are on now, Susana.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2023
Ivan McKee
That is absolutely right. The point that you made about putting Wales more firmly on the map with regard to international recognition is also hugely important.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2023
Ivan McKee
I have questions on the cost of the Taith scheme. First, I am interested in hearing about the £65 million that the Welsh Government has allocated over four years. I do not know how much background you will have on this, but I am keen to understand the thinking behind that number and what it covers. Have comparisons been made with what the UK Government is putting into the Turing scheme, which I believe is round about £100 million each year, and the relative costs of Erasmus? Have you had to make decisions about what should or should not be included, given budgetary constraints?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Ivan McKee
I am MSP for Glasgow Provan.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Ivan McKee
I want to follow up on that and a point that you made earlier about the different costs to deliver services if you are doing it at the parish level compared to the traditional route, things are done at a council level. Can you put any more colour on that—more specifics? Perhaps you can send in some more numerical examples of that later? I would like to understand the quantum and see some examples of that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Ivan McKee
Good morning. It is interesting to hear Jackie Weaver talking about the change over that 25-year period south of the border. If you go back 24 years here we had the McIntosh commission that raised a number of points and made the statement that
“Scotland today simply does not have a system of local government, in the sense in which many other countries do.”
I am interested to get your perspective on whether things have moved on in that time, or whether we are still back with the challenges we had a quarter of a century ago. I hate to throw your words back at you, Dr Escobar, but I think that you said something very similar this morning about the presence or legitimacy of community councils being patchy and contested across the country. I want to get your reflections on both of those points.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Ivan McKee
Absolutely. I have seen examples of that in my constituency, where an asset was not viable when the council ran it but ran perfectly well when a local group took it over.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2023
Ivan McKee
The issue that I want to get your perspective on is community councils’ relationships and how they work with other groups in your area, including community groups, third sector groups, development trusts—somebody has already mentioned those in perhaps not the most positive way so I would be interested to explore that and understand that a wee bit more—anchor organisations, such as housing associations and so on, which make up the tapestry and the ecosystem of organisations that are working together locally to further their communities. Who wants to start?