The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1228 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Good morning, panel.
I will ask about technology and digital services. We touched on the matter slightly in comments on the potential to exacerbate inequalities, but I will focus on understanding what role new and emerging technologies can play in providing support in the rural environment. The need for those technologies is probably greater in that environment, which gives the potential for them to be rolled out more rapidly in the remote and rural areas. What do you see happening with those technologies, and what else can be done to roll them out further? I am asking about digital connectivity, but also about medicines delivery by drones, sensor technology in homes and any other technologies that you might be aware of that are in use.
Who wants to come in first?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Ivan McKee
I do not have an issue with the substance of the legislation; it is more of a comment on process. Perhaps we could ask the clerks to do some background work on it. Clearly, the issue has arisen because there was an error in the drafting of the legislation. I am interested in getting more background information on how often that happens and on the process improvements that are looked at in order to reduce it. What is the process for finding such errors—how was this one found?—and what is the risk of them not being found in legislation that has already been considered? I would be grateful for any data that the clerks can pull together on that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Aye. I have two further brief points.
First, Iain Hockenhull is right to highlight that there may be a lot of unintended consequences once we start doing these things. We have heard that people may not want to be on the electoral register because they worry that it may trigger other issues in relation to which they would rather not be visible, for reasons good or bad.
Taking the data and putting it on the electoral register, and then having people confirm it, may be a route forward. It will be interesting to see where that goes. It will be good to get a sense of timescales and when you can come back with something.
Secondly, is the Government looking to do some other work to help with understanding the macro numbers a bit better? Comparing census data with registration data and looking at the historical data may give us a clearer perspective on what the gap actually is, because there seemed to be lot of dubiety around what the missing numbers were.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Good morning, minister and officials.
I want to touch on voter registration. You will have seen the recent evidence session that we had with the Electoral Commission on that subject. It is clear that we have concerns about the apparent number of potential voters who are not registered and the accuracy of some of the numbers that were put on the table. I would like to understand what conversations the Government has had with the Electoral Commission in that regard and what you see as a potential way forward to tackle some of those challenges.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Thank you for that clarification.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Ivan McKee
That is great. Thank you very much.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Ivan McKee
On you go.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Ivan McKee
We looked at that issue, and we had correspondence back from the Electoral Commission afterwards. There seemed to be at least two major issues: people not registering at all and what seemed to be at least as big a cohort—possibly bigger—of people being registered at the wrong address. That seemed to add up to the big number that the Electoral Commission has been talking about. Those things will probably require different approaches.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Ivan McKee
In your response to the information commissioner’s report, you said that you accepted the recommendations “in principle”. I do not want to get too geeky on the semantics, but I want to explore what that means. When you send the response back, will there be details about any parts of the recommendations that you are not accepting?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Ivan McKee
The clarification from the minister is welcome.
I will ask a bit about the costs of FOI. I cannot recall the number of requests, but we have had a briefing on it and it runs to, I think, many, many tens of thousands across the public sector annually. I think that it is increasing, which clearly carries a cost with it. Do you have any sense of how much of the Scottish Government’s total cost, which is somewhere in excess of £700 million per year, is a consequence of compliance with FOI legislation and what that looks like across the broader public sector? Is there any work on or any view or assessment of what those numbers might look like?