The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1067 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
I want to touch on the costs to local authorities, to get your perspective on whether the costs set out in the financial memorandum are accurate and realistic. There will also be set-up costs before you have raised any revenue. Have you given any thought to how the council would manage those set-up costs? Morag Johnston, do you want to go first?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
Okay, thanks.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
Okay. So a flat rate rather than a percentage rate is normal.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
My question is about the uses that the revenue generated by the levy is put to. The draft bill says that the levy would be spent on
“developing, supporting and sustaining facilities and services which are substantially for or used by persons visiting”
the scheme area
“for leisure purposes”.
How does that compare with any limitations that are in place in other countries or areas in Europe? We have had debates about the extent to which use of the revenue can be constrained. Also, the draft bill talks about leisure purposes here but it should also include business purposes. Any examples would be helpful.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
If I understand what you are saying, the majority of the 21 member states—every one, excluding five—have a flat rate. Is there a banded flat rate within that so that different types of accommodation providers pay a different flat rate?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
Good morning. My question is about the way of calculating a visitor levy and whether a flat rate makes more sense than a percentage rate. It is clear that there are pros and cons to both approaches. We have heard about complexity versus simplicity, costs and the potentially regressive nature of one compared with the other. It would be good to get a sense of how you see that and what examples there are from across your sector.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
I suppose that the businesses would argue that those costs are actually there, so they are having to pay for it, in effect.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
When you say “no financial impact”, do you mean no additional revenue to collect?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
I suppose that that is an incentive for councils to keep the scheme simple.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
Does anyone else want to come in on this? No. Thank you.