The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1360 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
There are and will be a lot of unknowns until we get through this phase of the assessment, including where we would even put that clause. We have put forward data today about 12 to 15-year outcomes, but it is hard to pin that down exactly at this stage.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
We always listen closely to what the sector has to say. We understand the cumulative impact of charges—of course we do—and we recognise that the sector has a crucial role to play in helping us resolve the housing challenges that we face. We will continue to work with the sector on that. Obviously, in a perfect world, we would not want to be doing this, but we need to.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
I would say that we are conscious of the concerns that developers have. We engage extensively with the sector on such measures. As you rightly identified, the building safety levy is being applied right across the UK, so I do not think that that would be a reason for a developer choosing to build disproportionately fewer properties in Scotland than in the rest of the UK, where the levy is also being implemented.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
That is absolutely correct. There is obviously a balance to be struck in relation to how we pursue our policy objectives. We must balance our policy objectives against the cost to those who will not be covered by the reliefs.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
The reality of where we are is that either the funding has to come from the Government’s capital budget—as the bulk of it will—or a relatively small proportion of it has to come from the industry. We are taking the same approach that has been taken down south in that regard, and we think that it is a proportionate response.
There is obviously scope for developers who are responsible for dealing with identified buildings that they were involved in to take measures to address that by pursuing the supply chain further down. It is true to say that we have extended the period in which developers are able to do that, but, as you identified, the complexity is such that the right option for us to take is to levy the charge on the developers for some of the cost.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
No. Unlike the system in England, which is based on the size of the development, we in Scotland are giving each developer an allocation that they can build levy free. Therefore, it is quite possible that small house builders, say, might not build their quota, which would mean that all—or the majority—of what they built would be levy free.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
Those housing issues affect all local authorities across the country, including in urban areas. There are clearly significant challenges in our cities—nobody would deny that. If we get into defining what we mean by the terms rural, semi-rural, small town, large town, city, or suburban, we could end up in quite a complicated space. We have stuck clearly to the definitions of rural and remote that are already in place. As I said, the application of the thresholds will significantly and disproportionately provide beneficial support for rural areas.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
All that money will eventually be spent on the remediation of buildings, but the issue is that we need to go through the legal process of identifying who the building owners are—we had to put in place the legal powers to do that. We need to go through the call for bringing forward buildings and then the assessment process, which has been funded, before we can start the remedial works. Work has started on a small number of buildings, but—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
Again, that it outside my portfolio. I will defer to officials to give some background information on that question.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Ivan McKee
It is important that the sector is asked to pay the tax. A building safety levy is a measure that has been taken forward by Conservative and Labour Governments south of the border, so our establishment of a building safety levy is absolutely no different from what is happening elsewhere in the UK.