The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1067 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
There we go.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Right, so the important number will be what percentage that is of the total spend on that benefit. I do not have that number to hand, but we can supply that to you.
As I said, there is a demand-led forecast for all those benefits. Over time, we work to refine that forecast. As Scott Mackay indicated, the SFC does quite a bit of work on that as well, and we will see variation, depending on the accuracy of the forecast versus the demand-led nature of those benefits.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
First of all, the nature of capital projects is that they are multiyear, so we will allocate a budget based on that. However, it may be the case that, for operational reasons, the project does not proceed as intended and there is slippage.
The capital budget is, as you know, increasing across the piece as we move into 2025-26, and it has been allocated to portfolios. I do not have to hand all the detail of what it is being spent on, but my expectation is that, with the projects on which there has been slippage, that money will go back out as part of the allocation for 2025-26.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
I do not disagree with you on that. Clearly, we would like to have wider scope with regard to borrowing limits. As officials have said, we manage that quite tightly, which is part of the reason why we have that scope with the ÂŁ350 million.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Officials can supply more detail. Those costs are obviously demand led—they depend on how many journeys are made. The relevant operator receives the funding back for those journeys. Officials will tell me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that the reduction was a consequence of uptake being not as much as expected—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
I think that we will need to come back to you on that very specific point.
Oh—we might have an answer.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Yes, we will send you that and what it has been in previous years.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Clearly, when we set inquiries up—there are a number of them running—the costs of those are—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Well, I would not say that. At the start, they are—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
It is a function of the environment in which we operate. If we were a normal, independent country and we had borrowing powers that we could exercise, we would be able to smooth that out, but, because we have very tight borrowing restrictions and we have to deal with—“the emergency stage” is probably too strong a phrase—the consequences of spending decisions that are taken at Whitehall, we need to balance the variables and try to predict what is going to happen down the road. The alternative would be that we had not received consequentials to anything like that extent, in which case we would be sitting here having a very different conversation. You would rightly be criticising us for not having taken steps to ensure that the budget came in on balance—which, again, is a requirement of a devolved Administration.