The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1229 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Ivan McKee
That is correct.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Ivan McKee
It will ask for opinions on where the bands and levels should be and for the evidence to support that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Ivan McKee
I defer to officials on specific timing, but we plan to get the consultation launched early in the new year. It is important to remember that this is all in connection with debts that have not been paid.
09:45It was assessed that an equality impact assessment was not required. The impact is on people who earn less—that goes without saying. It is about getting the balance right between how much they can afford and then, coming to councils, ensuring that there is not a disincentive for payment if debts are not pursued below that level. It is important to get that right.
Perhaps Richard Dennis can comment on the timing of the consultation.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Ivan McKee
Exactly, that is absolutely right. That is the point; we want to be able to reverse that expenditure—our intentions remain in place. However, pressures had to be dealt with. Which spends should we not have followed through? Should we not have increased health spend or followed through on those pay deals? What should we not have done? Those are important questions.
As I have said, there was a lack of clarity on the scope and scale of the consequentials that were coming from the UK Government, and it was necessary to use that money over that short period of time to be able to manage through that process, given our lack of borrowing powers. The UK Government and other Governments do not have that problem, because their borrowing powers do not have those tight constraints on them. A normal, independent country—dare I say it—that had the fiscal freedom to deal with that situation would have used borrowing powers to get itself over that hump, if you want to call it that. The fact that we do not have those powers means that ScotWind money has been used as a short-term buffer.
The strategic intention as to how to use that money is absolutely clear, and we are working to get back to that position.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Ivan McKee
I think that we answered the points that Michelle Thomson made. The transfer from net zero was largely to do with the fact that Scottish Water sits within the transport budget and a technical adjustment was made to the way in which its loans are treated. It was absolutely not the case that we decided to make a big cut in net zero because it was no longer a priority.
With regard to your question about transparency, we are striving to become more transparent. We have made a commitment to do that, and I think that the fact that we are becoming more transparent is evidenced by the way in which we have treated this process.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Ivan McKee
I am very happy to do that. There are many moving parts in this scenario. Many budget lines and different portfolios within them have different priorities and perspectives on how they want to spend the money, and there is an overarching perspective on how we balance the budget, which lots of factors can impact at any given point.
We strive to be as transparent as possible and to explain why there are changes in specific budget lines in specific situations. However, considering only the top level, such as in the examples that we have looked at this morning, can perhaps be slightly misleading in relation to the reality of why specific budget lines have been increased or decreased. Quite often, it is about technical or demand-led issues, or it can be things that are—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Ivan McKee
The nature of the numbers makes the pressure more challenging because of how the consequentials that flow through are worked out. Clearly, the money that flows through is a function of the decisions that are taken on total spend and tax by the UK Government. However, if you look at the public sector pay requirements for a given percentage increase in the rest of the UK, the proportionate increase in Scotland would be higher.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Ivan McKee
We make different decisions in Scotland about how we spend money, whether it is on tuition fees, prescription charges, the Scottish child payment, higher pay for nurses and teachers or a range of other decisions that we make based on what our priorities are and how we want to spend that money.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Ivan McKee
Yes, the calculation was done, and that is where the figure ended up. Clearly, there are a lot of variables in there from across all the different councils.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Ivan McKee
It is a lesson. The process that we go through is managing and predicting a large number of areas and a great number of unknowns, both on the revenue and the spend side. You have to make assumptions on those, otherwise you could not function. You have to do that in the context of reaching a balanced budget. We fine-tune some of that process on an on-going basis. There is no big lesson that you would learn. It is about looking at how accurate some of our assumptions were in the context of what we knew then and what we know now. That builds up our ability to make those assessments going forward.