The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1229 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
That is a good point. The registers would make that information easily available for anyone who chose to search for it. You are absolutely right that raising awareness of the change is important.
Jill, would you like to comment on what we have done specifically in that regard?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
In general, Registers of Scotland brings in enough revenue through its various activities to cover its costs, which, from a public finance point of view, is very welcome. That is the principle to which we operate in order to understand the costs of running the service and the likely number of transactions. We used that to arrive at a fee structure that would allow ROS to cover its costs as a consequence.
The initial £80 was based on an estimate of the number of transactions. That estimate was then revised as more work was undertaken in order to have a more thorough understanding of that. We estimate that there will be 25,000 transactions or thereabouts over the period of a year once the registers are up and running. If we do the calculations on that, with our estimated running costs, which are close to £1 million when everything is up and running, we come to that schedule of charges. That is why it is there.
It is about getting the balance right with regard to what people will feel is reasonable. Extensive consultation was undertaken on the matter, and many of the points that you raise were made. That was part of the reason for reducing the £80 charge to £30. I am not sure how many sheep you can buy for £30, but, in the grand scheme of things, if you are running sizeable transactions with many other fees involved, and borrowing against assets, I would expect that that figure would not be a significant issue.
As we move forward, there will be scope to revise the fees depending on whether more, or fewer, transactions come through, or how we see the costs working through.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
That is a good question. I will undertake to log in and see how it works to verify that. My experience of other registers that Registers of Scotland provides is that they are very easy to use and very accessible, but others may have different views on that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
The registers exist to create that visibility, so that people can search them. Exactly.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
Who can make a correction is limited to the parties that were involved in the transaction. To some extent, it depends on the definition.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
Are you talking about who should make the correction or who would be liable if there was some fraud as a consequence of the entry in the register being incorrect?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
That is a good question. I will defer to officials, as I have not been through the consultation responses in detail. Does Jill Clark want to pick that up?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ivan McKee
Has that not come forward?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Ivan McKee
You have to distinguish between investment for the buying of existing properties and investment for the building of new properties. The investment is going into the market to—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Ivan McKee
A number of factors impact the outputs that result from these decisions—