The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1228 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Do you mean the level of accountability of the public bodies to the Scottish Government, or the level of accountability of the Scottish Government to the Parliament?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Others may have a different perspective based on their experience, but I would say that both have the ability to gain traction in the media, which is, at the end of the day, where that pressure would be felt. If either route was generating commentary on the Government’s performance, what we have done or anything else, it would have the ability to generate that pressure.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Clearly, if somebody is not doing what they are supposed to be doing, we would be concerned about that. However, I am not aware whether the Government more widely is aware of that situation.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
You have probably answered the question. If a body can get through the 13 steps and survive that ordeal, there is probably a good case for it to be considered. However, the presumption is that we should not have to establish a new body. The framework codifies the process that you need to go through to make the case for why a new public body is needed. It is an effective approach, but I am very willing to hear other suggestions of how we can make the process even more robust.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
No.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
That takes us into an interesting space. Ministers are rightly held accountable, as we are every day in the Parliament and elsewhere, for delivery bodies in the public sector, but that does not reflect on the SPCB-supported bodies to the same extent.
Depending on the nature of the body, the relationship can be arm’s length. We do not tell the public bodies exactly what they should do daily. We appoint the body’s board, which then appoints the executives; we give it the budget; and we put in place the framework document that explains the relationship, as we have talked about in evidence. It then gets on with it.
That is the correct approach, because, for good reasons, we would not want ministers to be involved in every last detail of every single public body. It is always a challenge to manage, but it is important to recognise that there are various checks and balances in the system for how the bodies operate vis-Ã -vis ministers. Ministers are not the accountable officers for the finances and so on; by and large, that role sits with the chief executives of those bodies.
There are sponsor teams in the Government that have the responsibility for engaging with the public bodies, and they have an important role to play in scrutinising compliance. Performance issues can be raised, and performance is obviously the subject of regular discussion in Government. There are several areas where that is quite high profile and therefore talked about frequently in Government. However, the operational aspect is, by and large, still carried out by the delivery body.
We also have Audit Scotland, the Auditor General for Scotland and others that are engaged in the essential work that they do to keep track of how public bodies perform at various levels. There is also parliamentary scrutiny, whereby ministers are held to account in the chamber and, indeed, in committees, which also have the opportunity to bring in chief execs and chairs from public bodies.
There are various levels at which scrutiny operates, but it is important to understand the distinction from the day-to-day operation of those delivery bodies.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Yes, I think that they do. Of course, every case will be different. The reports will come to ministers who will, by and large, be very engaged with the public body and have a good understanding of what that body is working on. The report gives ministers and officials a sense check as to whether the public body is pointing in the right direction, with the right priorities and focus. The information will then be a matter of public record, which allows those in the wider ecosystem to see and understand what the body is doing.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
The Parliament, by way of its committees, has a hugely important role in that regard. It is not up to Government to decide how many committees there should be or what their workload should be. Committees have the scope to call in a broad range of public bodies and question them as part of any inquiry that they are undertaking—
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
If your argument is that we need more committees or committees sitting for longer, that is clearly up to the Parliament—it is not an issue for the Government.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ivan McKee
Again, if they are Parliament bodies, it will not be for the Government to be involved in the process.