The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1067 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Ivan McKee
Good afternoon, convener and committee. The draft order provides for amendments to schedules 10 and 10A to the Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (Scotland) Act 2013.
Schedule 10 is amended to ensure that group relief is available in instances of non-partition demergers. The effect is that group relief will be available in company reconstructions where ultimate ownership of relevant land or property has not changed.
Schedule 10A is amended to clarify the point at which the relevant five-year development period commences in respect of sub-sale development relief. That is important, as relief may be withdrawn where significant development does not take place within that period. The amendment provides clarity for relevant stakeholders, making it clear that the relevant period commences from the effective date of the sub-sale transaction.
The Scottish Fiscal Commission considered the financial impact of those amendments in its December 2024 forecasts and deemed them to have an “immaterial” and “negligible” impact, respectively. The draft order was developed following engagement with stakeholders as part of the Aggregates Tax and Devolved Taxes Administration (Scotland) Bill process. Members will recall that the amendments were considered by the committee at stage 2 of the bill process. Although the amendments were deemed out of scope at stage 3, the Scottish Government nevertheless recognises the need for the changes to be made.
I welcome the contributions from stakeholders in developing the contents of the draft order, and I look forward to taking questions.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Ivan McKee
I am happy for you to write to me, and we will respond with regard to the timeline for resolution. Clearly, the review that is coming on LBTT will catch those and other issues—it is intended to sweep those up. I understand the point that you are making, and I commit to giving more certainty on the timescales for resolution of those issues.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Ivan McKee
Over the time for which the ADS measures have been in place, a number of issues have arisen that were not foreseen when we brought in the legislation. Changes had to be made because of specific complicated circumstances that occurred, which gave rise to a need for clarity or changes in the provisions.
With the specific measures that we are considering today, we have not had any examples of people saying that there has been a problem with the transactions that they are seeking to take forward or have taken forward, but there has been a call from stakeholders that we clarify the law, just to be absolutely sure that investors and others are clear on it.
This is very much a tidying-up exercise, which obviously happens with all legislation. I do not know whether we would have taken a different approach. Clearly, if other examples were to arise whereby stakeholders felt that there was a need for clarification or a tidying-up of technical points, as can happen with any legislation, we would seek to respond to those.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Ivan McKee
Is that in regard to outstanding issues that have not been resolved yet?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ivan McKee
I do not believe that it will, but we will have to see. Clearly, a lot of secondary legislation will be introduced by the UK Government. I think that we will be able, by way of regulations and the code, to put in place measures in the devolved procurement space that are at least as comprehensive as the measures that the UK Government intends to put in place. I do not think that the bill will constrain us in any way from doing anything.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Thank you very much, convener. Good morning, committee. Thanks for inviting me to give evidence.
The Scottish Government remains clear that devolving employment law and industrial relations would be the best way to protect workers’ rights in Scotland, but, while those areas remain reserved to the United Kingdom Parliament, the Scottish Government will, as it always has, seek to drive up fair work standards through all available mechanisms, including public procurement.
For example, in 2015, we introduced statutory guidance under the Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 on the selection of tenderers and the award of contracts to provide guidance to public bodies on how to evaluate fair work practices, including payment of the real living wage, through procurement. In October 2021, we announced a new policy of mandating payment of at least the real living wage to workers involved in Scottish Government contracts, and we have encouraged other public bodies in Scotland to follow suit. Our commitment to driving fair work through procurement has been reinforced by a range of guidance, including interactive e-learning that we published in December last year.
Public bodies across Scotland are applying fair work in contracts, and the annual report on procurement activity for 2021-22 reports that, across 95 public bodies, a combined total of more than 2,000 suppliers are committed to paying at least the real living wage and delivering regulated contracts.
The Scottish Government’s ability to act in this area is constrained by the devolution settlement. However, the Employment Rights Bill confers some limited powers on the Scottish ministers, and it is for that reason that an LCM is required for those provisions. We look forward to working closely with the UK Government to build on our fair work principles and maximise the positive impact of the Employment Rights Bill across Scotland.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Not that I have seen so far. Other colleagues are engaging on that matter, because my remit covers procurement specifically. To the best of my knowledge, there has been no movement to date, but, as you know, we are forever hopeful.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ivan McKee
I will refer to my officials on that question, because, as you were right to say, it is quite technical. Stephen Garland, are you able to give any information?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Not that I am aware of. We are comfortable with the powers that the bill will confer on the Scottish ministers. I do not know whether my officials want to make any further comments.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ivan McKee
We take every opportunity, including this morning and in our engagement with the UK Government, to reinforce our position that, as I said in my opening statement, the best way to protect workers’ rights in Scotland would be for employment law and industrial relations to be devolved to the Scottish Parliament.