The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1354 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
I have a final few questions. You talked about shared services, which has been an area of particular focus for you, both in your previous ministerial brief and since you assumed your current one. It is interesting more widely, but it is particularly relevant to the committee. We have heard from SPCB-supported bodies that the co-location of services is working well where it happens鈥攆or example, in Bridgeside house, which, for clarity, is in my constituency.
A hub-and-spoke model is proposed by the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner. I do not know whether you heard his interesting evidence. He talked about how the centralisation of certain back-office functions, with the potential to group together commissioners that are alike, could be helpful. How does the Government approach shared services between public bodies? Earlier, you spoke about how you are trying to improve that鈥攊ncluding in your determination to deliver a more efficient approach to public sector property management through, for example, a single Scottish estate programme. It would be good to hear an update on that programme, but also any reflections on, for example, the co-location of a number of the SPCB-supported bodies in Bridgeside house. That is working well, but could it happen for example in another building that is part of the Scottish Government estate, to save further public money?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
I appreciate that it would be an upheaval if SPCB-supported bodies were to move their physical location, but it might save some money if they were to move elsewhere in the public sector estate. It was interesting that, last week, the Scottish Fiscal Commission clarified that, although it is located next to St Andrew鈥檚 house in the Scottish Government estate, it sees itself as very independent. That was quite a good example of a body鈥檚 location not impacting its independence.
Minister, is there anything that you want to emphasise to us that you have not had a chance to say yet?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Is there engagement with the SPCB itself, given its limited number of members?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
It is helpful to get that clarity.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Minister, you kindly agreed to write to the committee to follow up on some of the points that Richard Leonard raised, and Ash Regan and I will consider how to follow up on her questions in relation to things that have been said in public in this committee and in others. We will engage in correspondence on that.
All that is left to do is to thank the minister and his officials for taking the time to be with us today. It has been a very helpful evidence-taking session, and it is great to hear wider emphasis on the need for collaboration between the Parliament and the Government in all this.
10:40 Meeting continued in private until 11:06.SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you both.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you. Do members have any other questions? Lorna Slater, do you want to come in?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
It is really helpful that you have underlined that collaborative approach. I appreciate your point about the comparative ratio. The Scottish Government constantly thinks about efficiency and value for money, particularly at the moment, and rightly so, given the wider fiscal environment and pressures, but does it take into account the SPCB鈥檚 capacity when proposing a new body, such as a victims and witnesses commissioner?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Colleagues will ask about some of those areas later.
An issue that has been on our minds is that, at last week鈥檚 meeting, we heard from three public bodies that, although different types of arm鈥檚-length Government bodies, are still very much seen, both in Parliament and in the public domain, as being independent of Government. For example, the Scottish Fiscal Commission stated that it does not think that if it were to be an SPCB-supported body it would mean that it would function any more independently than it does now, with funding from the Scottish Government. How does the Scottish Government determine the level of independence from Government that a new public body would require? Does your consideration of the creation of new public bodies fit with the Scottish Government鈥檚 wider public service reform programme? I am sorry鈥攜ou have just answered that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
We are glad to hear that there is an openness about that.