The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1358 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Ben Macpherson
You talked about taking time. James Withers has said that a 10-year timescale for post-school reform is not unrealistic and that results will not be seen quickly. It is important for everyone to appreciate that. However, that could impact on the momentum. I am interested in what the Scottish Government is doing to build consensus politically across the sector and how momentum will be maintained. You said, rightly, that the review has been widely embraced by different stakeholders, but how do we keep the momentum going?
10:00Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Ben Macpherson
I absolutely endorse that. The people I grew up with have gone in different directions. There is absolutely a need to change the public consciousness, and I look forward to collaborating with the Government on that.
My final question is about the fact that people who become plumbers or joiners, to use your example, often have interests in many other things as well. The arts are facing a challenge in other parts of the UK, where some degrees or avenues of study and human knowledge are being discussed by some politicians as having less value than more practical qualifications. I have thought for some time that our society and individuals in their learning journeys and wider lives would benefit if practical skills could be combined with an area of the arts that they might want to engage in, whether that is a language or a creative subject such as art history. Has the Government ever considered that? It is not mentioned in the review but, to me, it is a pertinent issue at this time.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Ben Macpherson
That sounds like a good way to progress. I am sympathetic to the point that you made about wanting to take the appropriate time to test for unintended consequences and I appreciate your offer to write to the committee. On top of that, once you have reached conclusions on all the recommendations, even if some of them are to be rejected or implemented in a different way, it would be helpful for the Parliament to know the reasoning for your decision on each recommendation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Ben Macpherson
Dr Brown, I noticed that you were reacting positively to some of the comments that have been made. Do you want to add anything?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Ben Macpherson
Sure. Mr Wilson, do you have anything to add?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Ben Macpherson
Thank you, convener. Good morning. I thank the witnesses for their time.
Before I ask my question, I want to emphasise the points that my colleague Bob Doris raised about urban Scotland. As someone who represents a densely populated urban constituency, I think that the arguments and narrative about quality of place and health and wellbeing benefits are often much more compelling than the wider targets and discussions around the Montreal protocol, all of which can seem quite nebulous to people. Therefore, it is important that my colleague asked questions about the benefits of biodiversity in urban Scotland.
I have some questions about objective 3 in the biodiversity strategy, which is to
“Embed nature positive farming, fishing and forestry”.
Do you have confidence that agriculture, forestry and other land management policies are aligned with, and will support the delivery of, the biodiversity delivery plan? If so, why? If not, why not?
I will focus again on the questions of implementation, which were rightly raised earlier. What needs to happen in practice to ensure that agriculture, forestry and other land management sectors deliver biodiversity gains and that there is a just transition to a more nature-friendly position for farming as a mainstream approach? Does the draft delivery plan support that?
Sarah Cowie, do you want to go first?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Ben Macpherson
Before I go to Bruce Wilson, as my question is focused on alignment and delivery, I will mention the discussion at the beginning of the session about engagement between Government and stakeholders and about the challenges relating to co-ordination across Government, as well as the welcome challenge of broadening biodiversity as a cross-Government objective. If witnesses want to follow up with the committee on that, either in their answers to come or afterwards, that would be useful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Ben Macpherson
Unless colleagues have any supplementaries on objective 3, I will move on to objective 4.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Ben Macpherson
It sounds as if that is quite an important plan to develop at a good pace.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Ben Macpherson
Ailsa Raeburn, do you want to add anything or are you content?