˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1354 contributions

|

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Ben Macpherson

Mr Campbell talked about clerks speaking to one another regularly. In my experience—I envisage that this is other members’ experience, too—although correspondence is necessary, appreciated and beneficial, it is only when information is put on the record through, for example, a letter to a committee, that it can be scrutinised by the Parliament in the fullest sense. That is something for all of us to bear in mind.

We will now have a brief suspension. We will reconvene at half past 10.

10:27 Meeting suspended.  

10:30&Բ;&Բ;ܳԲ—&Բ;&Բ;

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Ben Macpherson

Thank you for your time, help and input to our task. This has been a really helpful discussion. That concludes the public part of today’s meeting and, as previously agreed, we will now move into private session.

11:09 Meeting continued in private until 11:30.  

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Ben Macpherson

Okay, thanks very much. I move on to the financial accountability of office-holders. The Scottish Information Commissioner described himself as being “financially hamstrung” and frustrated by the current funding model, whereby there is no scope for carrying forward funding and any underspends are lost. Does the SPCB recognise the challenges that he has referred to? What might be done to address that situation? Have any other bodies made similar points about the funding model or expressed such frustrations?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Ben Macpherson

I appreciate that it is a wider challenge in the fiscal framework and generally for Government, too. You can understand why it would be operationally frustrating. Can any improvement be considered?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Ben Macpherson

Do you want to ask your next question?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Ben Macpherson

That is so important. This is about the realisation of rights and the delivery of public services. Is there anything else that you want to say that you have not had the chance to say, to inform the committee as we now move to coming up with recommendations on the appetite for good delivery of public services, the realisation of rights and where all this fits in?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Ben Macpherson

Sorry, Ash—back to you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Ben Macpherson

My question was about the public sector estate.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Ben Macpherson

I will come in here, if that is all right.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Ben Macpherson

That dovetails nicely with Richard Leonard’s next question.