The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1354 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Mr Campbell talked about clerks speaking to one another regularly. In my experience—I envisage that this is other members’ experience, too—although correspondence is necessary, appreciated and beneficial, it is only when information is put on the record through, for example, a letter to a committee, that it can be scrutinised by the Parliament in the fullest sense. That is something for all of us to bear in mind.
We will now have a brief suspension. We will reconvene at half past 10.
10:27 Meeting suspended.SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you for your time, help and input to our task. This has been a really helpful discussion. That concludes the public part of today’s meeting and, as previously agreed, we will now move into private session.
11:09 Meeting continued in private until 11:30.SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Okay, thanks very much. I move on to the financial accountability of office-holders. The Scottish Information Commissioner described himself as being “financially hamstrung” and frustrated by the current funding model, whereby there is no scope for carrying forward funding and any underspends are lost. Does the SPCB recognise the challenges that he has referred to? What might be done to address that situation? Have any other bodies made similar points about the funding model or expressed such frustrations?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
I appreciate that it is a wider challenge in the fiscal framework and generally for Government, too. You can understand why it would be operationally frustrating. Can any improvement be considered?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Do you want to ask your next question?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is so important. This is about the realisation of rights and the delivery of public services. Is there anything else that you want to say that you have not had the chance to say, to inform the committee as we now move to coming up with recommendations on the appetite for good delivery of public services, the realisation of rights and where all this fits in?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Sorry, Ash—back to you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
My question was about the public sector estate.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
I will come in here, if that is all right.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
That dovetails nicely with Richard Leonard’s next question.