The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1358 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Good morning. Building on what has been discussed already, could you elaborate on the post-school reform agenda and how it can help colleges with some of the concerns around financial sustainability this year and, potentially, future years?
My other question relates to a point that was raised earlier. What should be the key considerations for the Scottish Government, the SFC and the institutions with regard to the idea of potentially increasing private sector involvement in the college sector?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Why is it flawed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
I can frame my thoughts only in relation to my constituency, in which Edinburgh College is. It is a fantastic institution; I appreciate the concerns that many of your members in Edinburgh College have. I also point out that there is huge potential for net zero-related growth in Edinburgh Northern and Leith and that creative industries are expanding there. The college already has a very strong creative aspect to it and can play a role in fulfilling the demand for skills in the net zero area. To me, there are huge opportunities for my constituents; the college, individuals and the community would all want to be engaged in them. That is why I am interested in the balance, which is relevant not only to my constituency, but more widely.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
I am just interested in what the balance would look like, but I am happy to move on.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
This is a question that I have also asked the Government. Do we need to think about having more joint courses? One part of the course could be a subject that is demanded by the market and might have more employability application, while the other part could be from the arts, community education or another area that is also really important in order to preserve knowledge and to ensure that there is a wide array of subjects that people can engage with. Do we need to think more about bringing different areas together in joint honours? I know there are lots of joint honours courses already, but do we need to consider that? I am sorry if that question is too broad. You can write to us if it is too much to answer now.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
That is not what I was saying. I say this as a philosophy graduate. People ask, “What are you going to do with a philosophy degree?” but it teaches a person to think. That knowledge has been amassed over hundreds of years: we do not want to lose the ability to learn those subjects, but we should do so in a practical and more competitive environment. That is why I am considering whether we need more collaboration between subjects.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Thank you, convener. My question relates to where I finished off in the previous question theme. What growth areas might the Scottish Government and others want to focus on when looking at where colleges can have the biggest economic impact in the period ahead?
09:30Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Thank you for setting that out.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
That is what I meant.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Thank you, colleagues. I am sorry for causing any confusion, but I did not want to come in with this question until colleagues had had the chance to ask about the major roads that have been mentioned so far.
I have a related question, cabinet secretary. Please excuse me if it seems to be too focused on my constituency, but it has relevance elsewhere. You might be familiar with Wardie Bay in my constituency, which sits between Granton and Newhaven, and with Lower Granton Road, which goes between those two areas. I have previously written to the Government about it and recently caught up with campaigners who are involved in the issue there. The residents on that road suffer very high levels of congestion, and there are often accidents because the road is so narrow. Campaigners have relayed to me that the road has twice the daily average number of vehicles travelling along it that the A9 has.
I wanted to raise that issue with you, because every time I have written to the Government the response has been—quite understandably—that it is a matter for the City of Edinburgh Council. However, in cities such as Edinburgh that have significantly growing populations, more might need to be considered in the positive and constructive Verity house agreement between central Government and local government on what investment needs to go into busy key roads in our city centres. Seafield Road, which leads into my constituency, is another one of those roads.
Those roads would require significantly less investment than is needed in the major roads in our country. They are very heavily used transport routes and the pressure on them is only growing. With the housing development that I hope will happen in Granton and the continuing housing development in Leith, Lower Granton Road will only get busier. Can that issue be considered further?