The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1358 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
On that, do you think that there is scope for the bill to have a more effective consolidating impact?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
So do you think that a public interest test would be a good addition?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Okay. Thank you. Mr Macleod?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
I presume that that also goes towards the completion of the land register, which is helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Just on that, you will be aware that Parliament will, in all likelihood, be passing another bill in that space today. Obviously we are at stage 1 of this land reform bill at the moment, but are you arguing that the process of this bill presents an opportunity for consolidation, or are you, perhaps in a more practical way, proposing that a consolidation act might be a good option for consideration in the next parliamentary session?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
I draw attention to my entry in the register of members’ interests, which shows that I am a trained lawyer. Although I am no longer a member of the Law Society of Scotland, I am on the roll of Scottish solicitors. For transparency, I state that Dr Jill Robbie and I used to work together in private practice.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
Thank you all for your time and for your submissions in advance of the meeting. Giving you the opportunity to build on those written submissions, we would be interested in hearing your views on the need for further land reform and on whether the bill, as drafted, will improve transparency, strengthen the rights and sustainable development of communities, and ensure sufficient and adequate supply of land. Perhaps Dr Robbie would like to begin.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
In your written submission, you say:
“a legal obligation of community engagement will allow those impacted by the decisions of the owner to have a say in the management of the land.”
Could you elaborate on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
I have one more question for you before we hear from the other panellists. In your written submission, you talked about
“the marketability of land in Scotland”.
I read that with interest. For full clarity, will you say a bit more about why you think that is important and why you would want Scotland’s land to be marketable? I am not sure that everyone would agree with that point.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Ben Macpherson
That does not necessarily directly relate to inward investment. Many people argue that land in Scotland is not well used enough as things stand. The line of argument that I read from the submission is that you think that we should be able to trade land and incentivise inward investment, and you are concerned that the bill might have an impact on that. I am trying to get a sense of what your line of argument is, because I am not clear about that.