The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1354 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
As colleagues have no other questions in this area, I will ask one final question. It goes back to our discussion a few moments ago before the suspension, when Richard Leonard and Lorna Slater were asking questions about the powers and functions that the bodies have.
Do you have a view on whether the SPSO or the SHRC are currently set up to take on any additional powers, such as incorporating rights-based commissioners? I am interested in hearing your views on that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Yes; I have got that feedback. I am just going to suspend the meeting briefly.
10:52 Meeting suspended.SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is helpful. I will hand back to Lorna Slater.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
I am sorry—that is not what I meant to suggest. I know that Bridgeside house is funded by the Scottish Parliament, but if, at some future point, there was co-location in a building that was owned by the Scottish Parliament, the Scottish Government or another public body and did not require a commercial lease, could savings be made? Has that been considered?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
I will come back to you in a minute.
I appreciate the point about wanting different aspects of the public sector to be in different parts of Scotland—that applies to the executive in particular—but I can also appreciate why a lot of the commissioners would want to be geographically located within easy access of the Parliament.
Our visit to Bridgeside house was interesting and helpful, and I welcome the fact that many of the commissioners are located in my constituency. We asked a question during our visit on Tuesday that I have heard being asked previously. I appreciate Jackson Carlaw’s points about the savings that have already been made, but that is a commercially leased building. Are there any public sector buildings that could be utilised to make further savings so long as the perception of independence could be preserved? Has the SPCB asked itself that question, or might it do so when considering the next break in the lease for Bridgeside house?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Operationally, and in many other ways, Bridgeside house seemed to be working effectively when we visited. I hope that I gave that impression.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you. Colleagues will have further questions, but I would just say that, as we have looked into this more deeply, the challenge for us has been that, although we see really rational reasons for the Ethical Standards Commissioner, for example, to be funded by the SPCB rather than the Government, the reasons are less clear in the case of, say, the Patient Safety Commissioner for Scotland and the proposed victims and witnesses commissioner for Scotland. In recent weeks, the Scottish Fiscal Commission has given evidence to the committee; it is very much seen by the Parliament and in the public domain as being independent from Government, but it is nevertheless funded by the Government. It has been an interesting and important discussion for our work, and I thank you for the points that you have made.
Jackson Carlaw, did you want to come in?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
That was really helpful, and it leads on to next area of questioning.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
That was very helpful. Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Before we move on, to follow up on what has been said, it would be good if the witnesses could say a little more about how the SPCB shares information with committees to support the governance and scrutiny of office-holders, whether through the Conveners Group or otherwise. Do you have any thoughts on how that could be improved, for instance in cases in which there are concerns about performance, how the body is run or its effectiveness?