The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1241 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I have listened carefully to the points from Katy Clark, and those from Pauline McNeill about the Contempt of Court Act 1981 and seeking a fuller understanding of the breakdown of jury decision making in the current system. However, I am not in a position to give a view on the practicalities of getting that understanding before enactment and implementation. That would be for the Government to articulate.
We are all balancing a difficult decision. How do we arrive at a position where the justice system performs in a way that delivers justice, whether that is for the victim, the complainer or the accused? We are all seeking to build a justice system that is more effective than the present one. That is not me implicitly stating that the current system is not effective, but we are in a process of trying to make improvements, having been called to do so by a number of stakeholders in different ways and having had an electoral mandate, communicated by the public in the 2021 Scottish Parliament elections, to see change in this area.
I will conclude by saying that the evidence that was given by the senators—and which is repeated somewhat verbatim in the cabinet secretary’s amendments—on the requirement for a majority of “at least 10”, is persuasive.
All things considered, I will be voting for the Government’s amendments.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I am sorry to interrupt Liam Kerr as he was concluding. I appreciate the point that he makes about other jurisdictions, but I highlight the challenge that we face, collectively, as a result of the fact that Scotland has a system of corroboration, which makes us distinct. We must consider all the different aspects of what makes Scotland’s current system distinct when we consider what changes we may or may not wish to make.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
For clarity, did you mean section 34?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I think that I heard 44.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is a helpful idea for us to consider in advance of having someone from Government here at a future meeting. I note that the Deputy First Minister told Parliament a few weeks ago that the national performance framework is being reconsidered, so we will make that part of our considerations.
That dovetails nicely with Ash Regan asking about accountability and scrutiny, so I will hand over to her.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I am sorry to interrupt. I do not want you to lose your train of thought so please do come back on those points later. You made a point there about the committee’s focus on the SPCB bodies meaning that we are only looking at part of a bigger picture. Is it important for the Parliament to bear that in mind and for the committee to consider it as we conclude in the months ahead?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you, all, for those final points, which were very interesting. In the coming weeks, we will speak to others about international examples of how things are done similarly and differently. There are considerations about what the next parliamentary session will look like and how the Parliament could scrutinise things. There are also considerations about whether there should be commitments in 2026 party-political manifestos. We will have representatives of the Government before us in the weeks ahead, and we will be able to ask them about the wider landscape that we have spoken about.
Thank you for those concluding remarks and for what you have relayed to us today in answering our questions and sharing your insights and views. The discussion has been extremely helpful for us, and we are grateful for your time today and in submitting the written material.
That concludes the public part of today’s meeting. As agreed earlier, we now move into private session.
11:27 Meeting continued in private until 11:40.SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is really interesting and helpful.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Dr Elliott, you are nodding. Would you like to add anything?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Good morning, and welcome to the seventh meeting in 2025 of the SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee. I have received no apologies for today’s meeting. The first agenda item is a decision on taking business in private. Do members agree to take item 3 in private?
Members indicated agreement.