The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1354 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
I fully appreciate that installing the grilles is not a panacea, but it is interesting and helpful to understand the impact that it has had. The committee will be interested to know how those considerations move forward beyond that trial.
Mr Mooney, you talked about the challenge on release. Do you want to say more about working with community partners on that challenge? Can more be done with stakeholders on how we support people who are coming out of the estate with addiction and mental health issues?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Kirsten Horsburgh, you talked about what I would argue is a perplexing situation in which we are sending people with addictions to prison, rather than treating them for that addiction. I appreciate that there is a political difference in relation to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and its consequences.
You mentioned that people who are already suffering from addiction are going to prison, and you talked about the need for provision for treatment in prison and on their release. However, we have also heard today鈥擨 think that Suzy Calder touched on this point鈥攖hat people鈥檚 drug addiction can be initiated in the estate. I appreciate that it is difficult to quantify, but do you have an idea of how many people already have an addiction as they come into the estate compared with people who develop an addiction during their sentence? Is that data available?
11:15Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Can that letter be shared with the committee?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Do you want to say any more on that, Kirsten?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
We turn to questions from Murdo Fraser.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
The Scottish Fiscal Commission is in a Scottish Government-owned building next to St Andrew鈥檚 house but is still very much seen as being independent. That is an alternative example.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Perhaps they could use space in an existing building.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Welcome, everyone, to the 12th meeting in 2025 of the SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee. I have received no apologies for today鈥檚 meeting, but Ash Regan will join us later, as she is giving evidence to another parliamentary committee this morning.
I am very pleased and grateful to welcome members of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body and supporting officials to the committee. Today, we have with us our colleague Maggie Chapman, who has responsibility for business support and office-holders, and Jackson Carlaw, who has responsibility for finance and organisation governance. Supporting them is Allan Campbell, head of operations of the chief executive group of the SPCB. I see that everyone is happy to proceed, so we will move directly to questions, the first of which will be from me.
Our witnesses might be anticipating this question, as we have consistently put it to witnesses to start off our evidence sessions, but it gets to the heart of why the committee is undertaking this work. What do you believe to be the purpose of an SPCB-supported body and how does it differ from a Scottish Government-supported body, from Scottish ministers or, indeed, from 成人快手?
When you answer, it might be helpful if you could touch on the following. We have heard evidence that SPCB-supported bodies are often created when independence from Government is required for the body to fulfil its functions鈥攊n other words, when it is important for the body to be perceived as independent. However, we have also taken evidence from the Scottish Government-funded bodies, many of whom are seen to be independent of the Government鈥攊n fact, you could argue that all of them are鈥攁nd are not funded by the SPCB, but by the Scottish Government. In addition, then, do you believe that the SPCB accountability model offers greater independence than Government-funded bodies?
Those are the questions that we have been wrestling with and I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on them. I do not know who wants to go first. Will it be you, Maggie Chapman?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
We accept the challenge. Maggie Chapman, do you want to add anything?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
That was very helpful.