The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1378 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
It is very helpful and interesting. The area of justice is quite interesting in itself, with regard to the wider question of SPCB-funded bodies and Scottish Government-funded bodies. For example, your organisation and the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner are funded by the Scottish Government because you are part of the accountability arrangements for the justice system, whereas the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman is funded by the Parliament and holds other public services to account. Such are the questions that we have been wrestling with over the past months, and your insights are helpful to us as we continue to do that.
I have one further question, and then I will pass to Murdo Fraser. As you might be aware, the Scottish Government has nine classifications of public bodies, such as non-ministerial offices and health bodies. Do you feel that your body has been categorised appropriately and that your framework agreement sets out the right relationships with the Scottish Government and the Parliament? As far as you are aware, has your classification and, therefore, your relationship with the Government, ever been reviewed or reconsidered? If you do not have huge amounts to say on that, please feel free to be quite succinct, but it would be interesting to get your thoughts on those two points.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is very interesting and helpful.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you very much. We now come to Ash Regan, who has questions on scrutiny and accountability.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Craig Naylor, do you want to add anything?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
In the public perception, the term “commission” might signify that there is a commissioner to advocate on people’s behalf. That is one of the issues that we are looking at, because there are a number of commissioners that are funded by the Parliament.
Julie Paterson, your organisation is a commission without a commissioner. Do you have any thoughts on that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
It is interesting that you all have different setups. That is helpful for our consideration.
I have one last question. I hope that this does not sound overly semantic. What do you see as being the difference between a commissioner and a commission? We have a number of commissioners and commissions, including the Scottish Fiscal Commission. Do you think that we should use that language more carefully?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
We will get to questions about function and similar points later in today’s evidence session. Thank you, both, for that helpful and insightful information. Craig Naylor, please come in on all the points that have been raised—and thanks for waiting patiently.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
Who would like to answer that first?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Ben Macpherson
John Ireland, a few moments ago, you wanted to come in but did not manage to. Do you want to come in now?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Ben Macpherson
Good morning, and thank you both for your time in giving evidence and for your submissions.
During the Brexit process, I was the Scottish Government Minister for Europe, Migration and International Development. At that time, the Scottish Government published a number of papers under the heading, “Scotland’s Place in Europe.” One of those papers, which was published in June 2018, focused on the impact of Brexit on cross-border crime and co-operation. It warned about the negative impact that the Brexit process and the withdrawal agreement—as it was then conceived, and later signed—would have in relation to Europol, the European arrest warrant, the European investigation order, the Schengen information system II, participation in Eurojust and the European protection order.
From what you have said today, it is clear that, latterly, since the withdrawal agreement was signed and the process took place, we are in a worse position. That is what your evidence seems to articulate. Am I interpreting that correctly?