The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 874 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Daniel Johnson
I guess the key question is: are you open to exploring some of those possibilities through stage 2?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Daniel Johnson
Fantastic鈥擨 will leave it there.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Daniel Johnson
I will tease out the other element. My understanding is that, according to news reports, the Ministry of Defence is currently examining whether Chinese electric vehicles should be allowed on Ministry of Defence sites. Again, I emphasise the point that our bus network is critical national infrastructure. If we view the bus network as critical national infrastructure, do you think that we need to examine where we are sourcing buses from, considering the elements of national security?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Daniel Johnson
I just wanted to understand that. I will ask about two broad issues. First, how did we get here and, secondly, what can be done? I will delve into the points that Derek Thomson brought up around the Subsidy Control Act 2022 and the art of the possible. On how we got here, we have some numbers in front of us. It basically looks like the business has struggled to recover to pre-pandemic volumes. The pre-pandemic volume of buses was around 1,200 a year, and the business has been unable to recover to that level. Is that the correct assessment, or are there other factors that we should be aware of and be looking at?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Daniel Johnson
On that, I am looking at the head count numbers and the balance between production and selling and administration. Compared with pre-pandemic levels, production head count is lower, but selling and admin are considerably higher. Is there a question here about the focus of the business? Is it focusing more on the administrative side of things as opposed to the production side, or is that a red herring? I apologise if I am asking daft laddie questions.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Daniel Johnson
I will ask a question that I have asked in private. The last thing that you need is politicians describing the situation鈥攜ou need politicians to do things. There are things for the UK Government to do and there are things for the Scottish Government to do. Are there things that 成人快手 could be doing individually to support your efforts to try either to win contracts or find solutions? What are the asks that you would make of us as 成人快手?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Daniel Johnson
That would be great.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Daniel Johnson
I guess that I am saying that we should update existing guidance or legislation. I am not saying that it should be replaced; I am saying only that it should be updated.
I also wonder whether the bill could update the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, as has already been alluded to. When we talk to community organisations, we sense that there is a feeling that, despite the mechanism in that act, public authorities do not necessarily help them to make their bids, let alone local authorities and other public bodies such as health boards baking into their service design the possibility of the 2015 act鈥攆or example, its community asset transfer powers鈥攂eing used in relation to running parts of their public service delivery.
Could there be an update to the 2015 act to create obligations to facilitate and enable such bids and to consider the provisions of the act and community wealth building as part of public service design and implementation?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Daniel Johnson
The previous witnesses alluded to things that perhaps should be included in the bill, such as initial facilitation that makes it easier for small businesses and community organisations to engage, processes to engage community organisations at the start of a process and standardised reporting. Those things might make a difference. Does COSLA think that the inclusion of those issues might strengthen the bill? Right now, local authorities are required to do some additional consultation and produce a report鈥攖here is no additional activity, duties or obligations. My concern is that, without exploring some of those additional possibilities, nothing much will change in some areas.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Daniel Johnson
Forgive me, you are slightly putting words in my mouth. Equally, if we had fundamentally different standards for weights, measures and product information from the rest of the UK that made it difficult to sell to the rest of the UK, there would be an outcry among those self-same people. There is a balance to be struck, partly because withdrawing from the EU has meant that there is a broad range of market regulation that now exists at UK level that was previously at European level. More importantly, as much as I believe in devolution, I also believe that we want common market standards and as big a market as possible, including at UK level. All that I am asking is whether there is not a balance to be struck and whether divergence is not a concern regardless of what market you are talking about. Is it not about how those competing interests are balanced?