The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1194 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
One of my concerns is that large businesses are twice as likely as small ones are to adopt AI. I wonder whether we are missing a trick. If AI has the potential to almost turn economies of scale on their head, do we need to concentrate a lot more on ensuring that all small businesses seek to use and leverage AI in the way that start-ups almost naturally do? What are your thoughts on that? What can we do to help?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
Good morning, and welcome to the 30th meeting in 2025 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee. We have received apologies from Lorna Slater. Before we start our brief inquiry into the use of artificial intelligence, I ask members whether they agree to take in private agenda item 3 and all future discussions on our AI inquiry. Do members agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
I am pleased that, under agenda item 2, we have with us a panel of witnesses to help us to consider the economic potential of artificial intelligence. We are joined by Seth Finegan, the chief executive officer of Informed Solutions; Peter Proud, the chief executive officer of Forrit; and Sarah Ronald, the founder of Nile.
I ask the witnesses to keep their answers as concise as possible, although, given that this is an expansive topic, that might not be possible. You do not need to press the buttons on your microphones鈥攕taff will operate them for you.
I will begin by asking a couple of questions. I am struck that, when discussing AI, we seem to be stuck in a binary place鈥攑eople think either that we are all doomed and all our jobs will be taken over by AI or that AI is a bit like the internet and Google and is just a bit of an upgrade. Given that you all work with AI in your day-to-day jobs, what do you think the impact will be? Where do you think the impact of AI will sit on the spectrum from total change to minor change?
Who would like to answer first? Peter Proud, you maintained eye contact for longer than anyone else, which is a dangerous thing to do.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
Yes, it does. Sarah Ronald, do you agree that we might be getting a bit carried away? You said that there is exponential change.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
Yes, the culture of announcements and the use of RAG status in the public sector could themselves be the subject of a whole inquiry. We will not go down that route. I will bring in Sarah Boyack.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
If it is brief.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
Do not tempt us, Mr Kerr. I bring in Gordon MacDonald.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you. There are some supplementary questions, first from Murdo Fraser and then from Kevin Stewart.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
I believe that Michelle would like to ask a brief supplementary.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you very much. I thank the panel for their very interesting and wide-ranging contributions. We have discussed everything from the possibilities for business through to the public sector, requirements for skills, and ethics.
I will just share one closing anecdote. As we have been talking, I have been using AI to follow up on some of the topics, including the point around ISO. I used Gemini to give me an explainer on what ISO 4200 was and was profoundly confused to get a summary about steel tube manufacturing, because it is 42000 that I should have asked about. That just goes to show that the old adage is true: if you put garbage in, you get garbage out. That is a perennial truth when using technology.
I thank the panel for their contribution. It has been incredibly useful, and not just for this work. We have the Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill going through Parliament, and some of the contributions on skills have been very informative for that.
With that, I bring the public part of the meeting to a close.
11:54 Meeting continued in private until 12:12.