The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 875 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you. I will leave it there, convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
Following on from what was just said, I would just add that we are not looking at the skills system with a blank sheet of paper, because there is an active proposal from the Government. Jack Norquoy said earlier that we need the system to be responsive, and it seems to me that we need industry and employers to be engaged up front. However, we are removing SAAB, which was one point at which we had industry engagement, and we also had the SDS board, which had industry membership on it.
Does the panel understand where the voice of industry sits in the Government’s proposals in the bill? What should be the parliamentarians’ response to the bill, based on that issue of the industry voice? Paul Sheerin, I will come to you first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
One of the things that I have said directly to the minister and to James Withers is that we are putting structure ahead of function and outcome. Is that a fair assessment?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
My second proposition probably brings us a bit more into this space. Having reflected on the evidence that we have taken, I wonder whether we need to almost flip some of the priorities on their head. Instead of, say, asking for more consideration to be given to the matter, we need to challenge every aspect of the education system to demonstrate what it is delivering on skills. It is not good enough for universities to turn around and say, “Your skills requirements are not our business.” We need to be challenging primary, secondary and all tertiary education and asking, “How are you contributing to skills outcomes?”
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
Just for clarity, are you arguing that we should be diverting money from other post-school education destinations—that is, university and colleges—towards the skills system?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
Now that we are at the end of our evidence taking, I have, instead of questions, one or two propositions that I would like to put to the panel, just to reflect my thoughts. I will ask just one of you to volunteer a response because, otherwise, I will not have enough time to get through them.
My first proposition—and reflection—is that we treat apprenticeships and skills as a bit of a monolith, when they are not, and I think that there is one particular element on which that view is taken. The fact is that apprentices do not end up with just one qualification; an apprenticeship is actually a method of learning. Does the panel agree with the proposition that we need greater clarity on the qualifications that people actually end up with, instead of just treating the apprenticeship as the thing in itself? Is the Scottish vocational qualification that people end up with at degree level? What about the qualifications in between? Do we need to be a little bit more refined in our understanding of what qualifications apprenticeships deliver?
Paul Campbell, everyone has stepped back and you seem to be left standing.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you. I would just like to pitch a slightly different question. Paul Campbell, you are here representing SAAB, which has essentially been scrapped. Has it been articulated to you what SAAB was not doing, or why it was not working, and therefore why it has been scrapped?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
Paul Campbell, I am going to come to you last, because I think that you will need to declare an interest in answering this question.
Sandy, can I pitch the same question to you? Given the importance of financial services, do you have clarity on where the inputs will be for industry? Do you think that there is sufficient interface with industry in the proposed structures?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
The renewables sector is probably facing the biggest change and needs the biggest increase in skills. Does Scottish Renewables have any clarity on where the industry voice will exist in the proposed new system?
10:45Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
Just finally, Paul, what are your top three or four things, to hit your Pareto point?