The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 805 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Given that potential risk, do you still consider the pause mechanism to be preferable to the current reset approach?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Any additional evidence or data that your office holds on whether such clarification requests are being used to delay disclosure would help the committee.
In your written evidence, you also highlighted concerns about how the provisions on valid requests interact with those on time for compliance. Can you explain to the committee why introducing the pause mechanism might create an incentive for public authorities to treat unclear requests as invalid?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
The fact that you have flagged only one company explains why, in the last session, we were not able to get any examples of where that anomaly had caused a hold-up in people receiving information.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Good morning. I have some questions about publicly owned companies, time for compliance and independent schools. Section 3 of the bill proposes a small technical amendment to the definition of “publicly-owned companies”. We have not discussed the issue in our evidence session so far, and only you and the Scottish Government provided any substantive views on it in our consultation. For the record, can you provide examples of companies that would fall within the revised definition of “publicly-owned companies”, as proposed in section 3?
09:15Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Do you have any examples of specific information requests or appeals that would illustrate the impact of that anomaly?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
That is helpful.
What support is your office prepared to provide to organisations that would be affected by a reversion to 20 working days as the maximum time for a response?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
So, the evidence is anecdotal.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Your evidence provided the committee with the statistic that 88 per cent of responses were provided on time last year. Does that statistic include cases in which requests were clarified multiple times?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Just briefly, convener.
Minister, I know that the power has never been used. However—and I am thinking about my constituents who might be looking at the headline here—can you set out the sorts of occasions on which it might be used? That would help people to understand why it is needed.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
My second question is about time for compliance and the proposal for a pause. The Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee and the member in charge both consulted on that, and responses about the proposed change were positive. I understand that the Scottish Government is not persuaded of the need to change the reset mechanism and allow for a pause. Will you give your views on that?