˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 805 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

What is your assessment of the root cause of the delays in using section 5, and can you speak to how your bill would address those?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

I was asking about the debate in the Parliament after Scottish ministers have used the section 5 power to designate a new public authority.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

Yes.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

Thank you. I will stop you there, Katy, because I was perhaps unclear in my question. The uncertainty is about when the legal change would take effect under the resolution in proposed new section 5A of the 2002 act.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

That is helpful. Thank you.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

That is helpful.

There were positive responses to the proposal to “pause” time for compliance in both the consultation by the Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee—I am in the wrong job to not be able to say “post-legislative”—and the consultation by the member in charge of the bill, Katy Clark.

Your response said that the proposal

“would undoubtedly be preferable to the approach required by the current regime” .

The Scottish Government suggests that improved guidance for public authorities on seeking clarification could address the information requesters’ concerns about delays. We will all have views on how helpful guidance is. Do you agree that guidance alone would resolve those issues? What changes would you expect to see in the revised code of practice in terms of timing and the approach to clarification requests?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

That was helpful. What are your views on the proposal to repeal the regulations that allow an extension of up to 60 working days for grant-aided and independent special schools whenever the statutory deadline for responding to a request would otherwise fall on a day that is not a school day?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

Thank you. That is helpful.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

Good morning. Thank you for the memo you sent to the committee, which lays out your position, and for your opening statement. Both were helpful. I have a couple of questions: one is about an area where the Government is supportive and the other is about an area where it is not.

The first question is on publicly owned companies. The Information Commissioner and the Scottish Government were the only organisations to provide substantive views on the proposal in section 3 that provides for a technical amendment to the definition of publicly owned companies. Are you able to provide examples of companies that would fall within the revised definition of a publicly owned company?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Ruth Maguire

I understand that. Have any specific information requests or appeals been made to your office that would illustrate the impact of that anomaly on access to information for the public?