³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 903 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Fulton MacGregor

This is a quick question on part 3, which is about failure to appear before a court following police liberation. It enables the courts to modify the date on which a person is required to attend court on an undertaking, if they fail to appear at court for a reason attributable to coronavirus. I am assuming that that is if they are unwell with the virus. The proposal is that that will expire on 29 November. What was the thinking behind that? I know that coronavirus is still among us.

Criminal Justice Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Fulton MacGregor

Is the decision not to reinstate throughcare support simply due to budgetary pressures?

Criminal Justice Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Fulton MacGregor

Are the Community Justice Scotland throughcare services still offered through the Wise Group and Sacro? Do the costs of providing throughcare services not come out of your budget at all?

Criminal Justice Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Fulton MacGregor

Do the Wise Group and Sacro provide throughcare services for everybody, including all prisons and all populations?

Criminal Justice Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Fulton MacGregor

Good morning. I want to ask about throughcare services, which is an issue that has come to the committee before and there have been various exchanges on. Generally, what is the current position with throughcare services? Forgive me if I have missed it, but I did not see anything on that in your submission.

Criminal Justice Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Fulton MacGregor

Can I ask one more question, convener?

Criminal Justice Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Fulton MacGregor

Do you agree that having a multiyear funding model for third sector bodies could be helpful in the longer term, or are you quite happy with the current model? I ask that question, because the witnesses in the previous session were talking about the throughcare model being replaced by third sector organisations, such as Sacro and the Wise Group, which I think do an absolutely fantastic job. Is there an argument for multiyear funding for such organisations within the justice sector?

Criminal Justice Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Fulton MacGregor

Thank you, cabinet secretary.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Regulation of Legal Services (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Fulton MacGregor

To avoid the risk of stepping on any colleagues’ toes in terms of where they go with questioning, I will leave it there, but I might come in again towards the end of the meeting if that is alright.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill: Reconsideration Stage

Meeting date: 7 November 2023

Fulton MacGregor

Good morning, cabinet secretary and officials.

Cabinet secretary, the committee has already heard, in written evidence and in the oral evidence taken last week, a lot of support for the approach that you have taken, as it aims to minimise the risk of referral to the Supreme Court, as you have said. However, in your letter, you indicated that there was the potential to have gone further. Can you elaborate on that and on why, in the end, you chose to keep the approach that has been outlined?