The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 903 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Fulton MacGregor
I am not really asking you to develop the policy. You have been clear that you have issues with the proposals as they are set out, and I was asking whether you had any thoughts or suggestions as to how they could be rectified and how the policy might work better in practice. However, I accept your point that this will take further discussions.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you. You have made a compelling case about how you and the review group came to your decision.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Fulton MacGregor
I was going to ask about independent legal representation, but Russell Findlay got in there before me, so I will ask about another area.
To go back to John Swinney鈥檚 point, we have heard concerning evidence about how victims and witnesses鈥攐r rather, complainers鈥攈ave felt during their trial, particularly during cross examination, with regard to the practice of bringing up their character or, perhaps, sexual history. Is the recommendation for legal representation to protect people on that particular aspect?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Is there any way to strengthen the current arrangements to ensure that they do not fail?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you for your powerful evidence so far, including what you have just said.
I will ask about the same subject that I asked about in the previous evidence session鈥擨 do not know whether you saw it. What are your views on independent legal representation? What I am getting from your submission is that the Crown Office is generally supportive of the idea and the provisions for it, but that it envisages some problems. You have outlined some ways in which those problems might be resolved. Could you expand on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Good afternoon. I will stick to the line of questioning that I followed with the previous two panels of witnesses, which is on the issue of independent legal representation. Your submission is different to those of Lady Dorrian and the Lord Advocate, in that you raise concerns about the resource implications and the possibility of delays to cases. Can you expand on those concerns? Is there any merit to the suggestion and, if so, how could it be achieved, if not through the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Fulton MacGregor
My questioning so far, and in the earlier evidence session, has focused on independent legal representation in relation to the rape shield provisions鈥攁s Lady Dorrian said, she recommended ILR for that purpose only. What are your thoughts on independent legal representation being provided for complainers in a wider context, perhaps when they first make a complaint?
We have heard a lot of evidence鈥擨 am sure that you have heard it as well鈥攖hat when somebody makes a complaint to the police in these situations, that is it for them until they are next contacted by the criminal justice system. Is there a role for the provision of independent legal advice at an earlier stage, so that somebody could go through with people making a complaint how things might pan out?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Fulton MacGregor
That was my next question. It sounds like you are supportive of the principle but, like the Lord Advocate, you perhaps have concerns over how the arrangements might work in practice.
My next question, then, is: how do we make the process work more easily? What is the answer? It may not be so simple, but you are saying that you would be happy to work with the Scottish Government. At this stage of scrutiny of the bill, it would be helpful for us to understand how things could work.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Personally, I think that independent legal representation is a really good idea. I welcome the proposals on that in your report and in the bill.
Going back to what Russell Findlay said, if it is not workable for whatever reason, is there another way to deal with defence lawyers bringing up the issue of character and sexual history as part of their defence? Did the group look at any other way that that could be addressed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Fulton MacGregor
To go back to your submission, my understanding is that you are supportive of the proposal but think that it is not fair to put all the responsibility on the Crown and that how the process would work in practice needs to be thought out.