成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 895 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Fulton MacGregor

Good morning to both of our witnesses, and thanks for the evidence so far. I want to ask about the public鈥檚 level of awareness of the regulator. The committee heard some evidence that, unless you are a tenant or another service user who is involved with a landlord, there is likely to be a low level of awareness among the public. Do you accept that, or do you have a different view on it?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Fulton MacGregor

You have asked my question to Michael Cameron, which is great.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Fulton MacGregor

I was going to ask about the national panel but you have gone on to answer that, which is great. I was going to ask in particular about the Gypsy Traveller community, but you have given some details. In the interests of time, I will not go back over that, but are there any other groups that the national panel has particularly focused on?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Fulton MacGregor

I welcome the work on the Gypsy Traveller community. I was on the Equalities and Human Rights Committee in the previous parliamentary session, when a lot of work was done on that. Alexander Stewart was on that committee, too.

I have a question on the perception of the panel. We have heard evidence that the panel can often feel one-sided. We were told:

鈥淚t is not a two-way process; it is not a dialogue or a conversation. It simply involves answering a survey.鈥濃擺Official Report, Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, 3 December 2024; c 31.]

What would you say to that? Do you take on board that criticism? If so, do you have any plans to address it?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Fulton MacGregor

Thank you.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Fulton MacGregor

To go back to Rona Mackay鈥檚 question, is it such a bad thing? Could such a set-up have really negative consequences, or could it work and be a fair justice system? Do you know what I am getting at?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Fulton MacGregor

You said something earlier, Simon, about the comparison of the conviction rates in Scotland and England. In England, there is a 鈥渂etter鈥濃擨 put that in inverted commas鈥攃onviction rate. Is there a risk of Scotland鈥檚 not having a similar rate? Could having unanimity lead to more convictions and alleviate the concerns of victims organisations?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Fulton MacGregor

My question is a wee bit different. I probably did not explain it right. The complainer should have a choice as to whether to give evidence in court or not, but do you ever come across a situation where a complainer would prefer to give prerecorded evidence or evidence on commission鈥攊n this example, it would probably be prerecorded evidence鈥攂ut feel that they are more likely to be believed, for want of a better term, if they do it in court? My question was more about that. If that is an issue鈥攚e do not want to go back to the stage 1 evidence, as the convener will probably remind me, so I link the question to today鈥檚 discussion鈥攃ould an amendment be lodged to address that?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Fulton MacGregor

Good morning to both witnesses. My question follows on from Sandy Brindley鈥檚 point about the evidence of vulnerable witnesses. The cabinet secretary has said that she proposes to lodge an amendment around the opportunity to give prerecorded evidence. What exactly would you like the amendment to say? What should it look like? It is an important amendment, which will come before us quite soon. It is important that we get it right鈥攖he sexual offences court will not work if it is a sexual offences court only in name; it must have all the right stuff around it.

Sandy, what should that look like, and where should the choices be for victims and witnesses? We were beginning to touch on that a minute ago.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Fulton MacGregor

Do you ever get an indication or feeling from the victims who you deal with that prerecorded evidence could be less effective, so it is important to give evidence in person? If that is the case鈥擨 am not sure whether you are going to tell me that you have found that, but I saw Sandy Brindley nod a wee bit鈥攃ould an amendment to the bill be lodged to try to alleviate that concern?