The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 895 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning to both of our witnesses, and thanks for the evidence so far. I want to ask about the public鈥檚 level of awareness of the regulator. The committee heard some evidence that, unless you are a tenant or another service user who is involved with a landlord, there is likely to be a low level of awareness among the public. Do you accept that, or do you have a different view on it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
You have asked my question to Michael Cameron, which is great.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
I was going to ask about the national panel but you have gone on to answer that, which is great. I was going to ask in particular about the Gypsy Traveller community, but you have given some details. In the interests of time, I will not go back over that, but are there any other groups that the national panel has particularly focused on?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
I welcome the work on the Gypsy Traveller community. I was on the Equalities and Human Rights Committee in the previous parliamentary session, when a lot of work was done on that. Alexander Stewart was on that committee, too.
I have a question on the perception of the panel. We have heard evidence that the panel can often feel one-sided. We were told:
鈥淚t is not a two-way process; it is not a dialogue or a conversation. It simply involves answering a survey.鈥濃擺Official Report, Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, 3 December 2024; c 31.]
What would you say to that? Do you take on board that criticism? If so, do you have any plans to address it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
To go back to Rona Mackay鈥檚 question, is it such a bad thing? Could such a set-up have really negative consequences, or could it work and be a fair justice system? Do you know what I am getting at?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
You said something earlier, Simon, about the comparison of the conviction rates in Scotland and England. In England, there is a 鈥渂etter鈥濃擨 put that in inverted commas鈥攃onviction rate. Is there a risk of Scotland鈥檚 not having a similar rate? Could having unanimity lead to more convictions and alleviate the concerns of victims organisations?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
My question is a wee bit different. I probably did not explain it right. The complainer should have a choice as to whether to give evidence in court or not, but do you ever come across a situation where a complainer would prefer to give prerecorded evidence or evidence on commission鈥攊n this example, it would probably be prerecorded evidence鈥攂ut feel that they are more likely to be believed, for want of a better term, if they do it in court? My question was more about that. If that is an issue鈥攚e do not want to go back to the stage 1 evidence, as the convener will probably remind me, so I link the question to today鈥檚 discussion鈥攃ould an amendment be lodged to address that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning to both witnesses. My question follows on from Sandy Brindley鈥檚 point about the evidence of vulnerable witnesses. The cabinet secretary has said that she proposes to lodge an amendment around the opportunity to give prerecorded evidence. What exactly would you like the amendment to say? What should it look like? It is an important amendment, which will come before us quite soon. It is important that we get it right鈥攖he sexual offences court will not work if it is a sexual offences court only in name; it must have all the right stuff around it.
Sandy, what should that look like, and where should the choices be for victims and witnesses? We were beginning to touch on that a minute ago.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Do you ever get an indication or feeling from the victims who you deal with that prerecorded evidence could be less effective, so it is important to give evidence in person? If that is the case鈥擨 am not sure whether you are going to tell me that you have found that, but I saw Sandy Brindley nod a wee bit鈥攃ould an amendment to the bill be lodged to try to alleviate that concern?