The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1525 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Monica Lennon
I will bring in Ailsa Raeburn, but I want to stick with Sarah Cowie for a moment. You have made it clear that there are many unknowns, but from a farming and crofting perspective, what would you say are the main risks and opportunities of pursuing private investment in Scotland’s natural capital?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Monica Lennon
I love the anecdote about chatting to the taxi driver about SUDS. That is the kind of thing that I would do, as a planner at heart.
“The People’s Plan for Nature” calls for more locally managed green spaces, which might fit with the point that you made about what happens after sites are built out and occupied. The community stewardship role is really important.
Ailsa Raeburn might want to come back in, but does anyone else want to say anything briefly on this theme before I hand back to the convener?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Monica Lennon
If there is time, I will take Ailsa and then Paul.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Monica Lennon
I agree. Back to you, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2023
Monica Lennon
Are you taking that up with The Guardian?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2023
Monica Lennon
On that point, then, you seem to agree more with Mr Packham, who is calling for a moratorium until we look at the issue with mortality rates.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2023
Monica Lennon
One of the suggestions that we got in our written submissions was that the marine directorate should undertake—if I can read my handwriting—
“a strategic review of its enforcement assets”.
That is looking at equipment as well. The point being made was that we need to have effective deterrence of illegal activities. Is there a concern about equipment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2023
Monica Lennon
Thank you. Tavish?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2023
Monica Lennon
Okay. I am sure that we have not heard the last of that, because serious issues have been raised, although we will not get to the bottom of them today. However, we have heard many calls for better regulation and better enforcement. That brings me back to resources. In written submissions, many stakeholders raised concerns about the strategy. We have also heard about a big reduction in the budget for bodies such as NatureScot.
I would like to start with Dr Clare Cavers and work along the table: do you have concerns about the resourcing of the strategy, which I like to think of as not just a biodiversity strategy but about Scotland’s nature emergency? Where will the funding come from, or what does the funding need to look like, for it to work effectively?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2023
Monica Lennon
Perhaps panel members can respond to that, but first, in your written submission, you stated that
“there should be ‘biodiversity impact’ screening for any recipient of public funds, including in their supply chains.”
Why is that important?